[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] Re: licenses
From: |
Edi Granado |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] Re: licenses |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2007 18:02:36 +0200 |
I found a similar situation with unzip (info-zip).
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/u/unzip/unzip_5.52-10ubuntu1/unzip.copyright
We shoud either way remove tetex and replace it, the developer decided
not to make new releases: http://www.tug.org/tetex/
On 8/29/07, Edi Granado <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some question about our license policy.
>
> - The FSF think the Artistic License are not free because its to vague. What
> is our opinion about this license?
>
> - The packages tetex-base and tetex-bin including files who are under the
> TeX/MetaFont license wich they are freely modifiable but as long as the
> resulting program is not called TeX or MetaFont. Is this license free?
>
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_3.0-27ubuntu1/copyright
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-15ubuntu1/copyright
>
> - The package tex-common include files that have no license and only are
> copyright.
>
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_1.9/copyright
>
>
> Edi
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [gNewSense-users] Re: licenses,
Edi Granado <=