[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV progress

From: Chris Andrew
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV progress
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:46:28 +0100

Kevin/ all,

As far as I'm concerned, as long as we have "package name/ licence/ Free?", anything else just helps, as long as we don't fill it with crap.

Whilst I'm here, I've literally just added another column, here . Could you take a look.



On 07/07/07, Kevin Dean < address@hidden> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is breaking a format, I don't see anything
established here.

On I put a brief summary
of libf which seems to be similar to the other summaries.

On itself I've added two new
sub-headings: Relevant Bugs and Actions Taken - I hadn't seen anything
like this so I made it up. :P


On 7/7/07, Chris Andrew <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, all.
> More progress is being made with Package Freedom Verification.  Could I ask
> people who are being good enough to spend time on this project, to put a
> short summary next to the letter/s they are working on.
> This is already happening in some cases, which is great.  All status
> summaries should have the date of the update, whether the list is 100% free,
> if not, something to reflect this, such as three packages suspected to be
> non-free.
> If packages are suspected to be non-free, then as mentioned earlier, these
> packages need to be added to the "Suspected non-free" page, and a bug raised
> against the package.
> Bottom-line:  Great work being done, and it would be helpful if you could
> put a short summary for your work.
> Many thanks- keep it up.
> Cheers,
> Chris.

gNewSense-users mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]