|Subject:||Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV progress|
|Date:||Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:46:28 +0100|
I'm not sure if this is breaking a format, I don't see anything
On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/PackagesInMain I put a brief summary
of libf which seems to be similar to the other summaries.
On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/MainLibf itself I've added two new
sub-headings: Relevant Bugs and Actions Taken - I hadn't seen anything
like this so I made it up. :P
On 7/7/07, Chris Andrew <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, all.
> More progress is being made with Package Freedom Verification. Could I ask
> people who are being good enough to spend time on this project, to put a
> short summary next to the letter/s they are working on.
> This is already happening in some cases, which is great. All status
> summaries should have the date of the update, whether the list is 100% free,
> if not, something to reflect this, such as three packages suspected to be
> If packages are suspected to be non-free, then as mentioned earlier, these
> packages need to be added to the "Suspected non-free" page, and a bug raised
> against the package.
> Bottom-line: Great work being done, and it would be helpful if you could
> put a short summary for your work.
> Many thanks- keep it up.
gNewSense-users mailing list
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|