Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV progress

[Chris Andrew]

Kevin/ all,

As far as I'm concerned, as long as we have "package name/ licence/ Free?", anything else just helps, as long as we don't fill it with crap.

Whilst I'm here, I've literally just added another column, 
here . Could you take a look.

Cheers,

Chris.

On 07/07/07, Kevin Dean < address@hidden> wrote:

I'm not sure if this is breaking a format, I don't see anything
established here.

On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/PackagesInMain I put a brief summary
of libf which seems to be similar to the other summaries.

On http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/MainLibf itself I've added two new
sub-headings: Relevant Bugs and Actions Taken - I hadn't seen anything
like this so I made it up. :P

-Kevin

On 7/7/07, Chris Andrew <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> More progress is being made with Package Freedom Verification.  Could I ask
> people who are being good enough to spend time on this project, to put a
> short summary next to the letter/s they are working on.
>
> This is already happening in some cases, which is great.  All status
> summaries should have the date of the update, whether the list is 100% free,
> if not, something to reflect this, such as three packages suspected to be
> non-free.
>
> If packages are suspected to be non-free, then as mentioned earlier, these
> packages need to be added to the "Suspected non-free" page, and a bug raised
> against the package.
>
> Bottom-line:  Great work being done, and it would be helpful if you could
> put a short summary for your work.
>
> Many thanks- keep it up.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris.
>


_______________________________________________
gNewSense-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users