Brian Brazil wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Karl Goetz <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Matthew Flaschen wrote:
>> > Karl Goetz wrote:
>> >> The idea thats appealing to me most at the moment is to divide as
>> such:
>> >> - General/version independent help
>> >> - gNewSense 1.x
>> >> - gNewSense 2.x
>> >> - gNewSense 3.x
>> >> - etc
>> >
>> >
>> > This seems like a good idea, but realistically people would really end
>> > up putting version-independent information (which almost everything
>> is)
>> > in the version sections.
>>
>> Thats true enough, but thats when moving pages comes into it (and trying
>> to have 'how to contribute' explaining such things).
>
> What about tagging information within a page as "tested with deltad",
> "tested with kdeltaf" etc.?
I like the solution, i just wonder about different releases with
different issues - do we have a different section of the same page
('jump to' links at the top to get to them) or different pages for each?
hm
i might think about this.
>
>> >
>> >> We seem to be planing to ask users to do what in ubuntu land is a
>> Dapper
>> >> -> Feisty jump - a 12 month, unsupported upgrade.
>> >
>> > I didn't think anything was supported. :) Seriously, I wasn't
>> expecting
>> > to upgrade. I already have /home on a separate partition (highly
>> > recommended) so I'm willing to install from scratch.
>> >
>> > Matt Flaschen
>>
>> Ubuntu support one release to the next, as of yet i dont think we have a
>> policy (only having one release). However, can we support a jump ubuntu
>> wont?
>
> I really doubt it.
>
Nows when it needs to be taken into consideration.