[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] What's up with MIT-SHM ?
From: |
Dossy Shiobara |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] What's up with MIT-SHM ? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:11:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) |
Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
I asked Dossy about it on a message on gnash-commit@ from Wed, 18 Jun
2008 04:22:07 +0200 (CEST). Dossy hasn't sent a response yet.
I have the build issue fixed locally, although I'm hesitant to enable
MIT-SHM because of bug #23624.
I may have deleted that message without reading it - sorry. Let me go
look in the archive ...
Ah, you asked:
Okay, but why was it necessary to undef ENABLE_MIT_SHM?
I shouldn't have - I should have fixed configure to make sure
gnashconfig.h was generated correctly. In gnashconfig.h on Win32, I see:
/* Use MIT-SHM X extension if available */
#define ENABLE_MIT_SHM 1
So, either:
1) autoconf needs adjustment to not define that on Win32, or
2) Win32 builds need to work with ENABLE_MIT_SHM defined
Sorry about the hasty #undef - I must have left it in while hacking the
Win32 build back to life.
Should Win32 builds use MIT-SHM? Given that the resulting binaries are
not meant to run under Cygwin X11, I would guess the answer should be
"no" - am I understanding correctly?
--
Dossy Shiobara | address@hidden | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)