Re: [Gnash-dev] Character definitions design

[Sandro Santilli]

On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 04:29:16PM +0200, Udo Giacomozzi wrote:

> SS> I simply dislike the dox saying that a definition is immutable.
> SS> A whole set of bad assumption could derive from it. Think about the caches
> SS> or meshes becoming invalid when the definition changes.
> 
> Yes, I think mentioning the exception (dynamic shapes) would do...

Just for the record. I found another case: edit_text_character_def.
It is dynamically created for createTextField (I keep thinking keeping
the bad design isn't such a good idea).

--strk;