[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build
From: |
Rob Savoye |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:33:56 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
strk wrote:
>> But some people allready started modifying libltdl, so it is not obvious
>> what to do now.
To be honest, we *shouldn't* be modifying libltdl at all. I was just
looking a the diffs, and they're pretty minor. One is a win32 hack that
really shouldn't be there, and the other is a minor addition for riscos.
I believe both these patches could be handled better at a higher level,
and we'd be better off using libtoolize -ltdl to avoid problems.
- rob -
- [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Patrice Dumas, 2006/11/28
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Patrice Dumas, 2006/11/28
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, strk, 2006/11/28
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, strk, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Patrice Dumas, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/29
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Patrice Dumas, 2006/11/30
- Re: [Gnash-dev] [patch] for build, Rob Savoye, 2006/11/30