[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers
From: |
Markus Gothe |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:39:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060926) |
Well, there is boost-libs to, which are compiled by default in dists
like gentoo (and distributed in other I guess). Takes a really long time
to compile them.
I'll look at your m4-macro and the one at http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to
Yeah, running gcc with -ansi or -std=c99 (combinded with -pedantic for
masochists ;)) is nice... Yeah, the gcc4 is a great catch up but still
lacks features like Inline Procedual Optimization (IPO, sometimes called
IPA).
FWIW: My commits are now sent to the commit-list...
//Markus
Rob Savoye wrote:
> Markus Gothe wrote:
>> Exactly my thoughts! I think configure should #define HAVE_BOOST_LIB or
>> something like that... I'll see if there is m4-macros for this already
>> or write some kind of routine.
>
> I just wrote a configure macro for boost. My simple question is do you
> prefer BOOST_CFLAGS value to match. Since I gather Boost is a collection
> of related headers, I can keep adding code to look for the modules we
> need. My current test just find the right directory to set the include
> path.
>
>>>> For the boost part I discovered that the needed functions in boost can
>>>> easily be extracted by using CC -E. The whole smart prt code (including
>>>> shared pointers) is only ~26kb totally, so I don't see a reason not to
>
> Since Boost is just header files, why would we even need to extract
> anything ? I'll admit I know little about Boost other than it's highly
> recommended.
>
> - rob -
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnash-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers, (continued)
[Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers, Mateusz Loskot, 2006/09/24
[Gnash-dev] Re: shared pointers, Mateusz Loskot, 2006/09/24