[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-dev] singleton vs. static globals
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
[Gnash-dev] singleton vs. static globals |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 02:22:18 +0200 |
[gnash-dev included]
Vitaly, I finally turned SWFHandlers in a singleton.
Does it fix the initialization order ?
I'm now (after last huge commit) having problems
of statics again (segfault on finish) should we take
the singletons path ?
--strk;
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:55:06PM +0400, Vitaly Alexeev wrote:
> strk <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >Vitaly, what was wrong with keeping SWFHandlers static
> >initializers in the swf/ASHandlers.cpp file, where the
> >rest of the class is defined ?
> >Isn't the compiler able to initialize statics in the correct
> >order ?
>
> Hi,
>
> I did so, because
> VC++ compiler initialize statics in the different order than GNU C++
> compiler
>
> Vitaly.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Gnash-dev] singleton vs. static globals,
strk <=