[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure
From: |
bl0ckeduser |
Subject: |
[Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:25:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #38084 (project gnash):
Here is the log of TEST2 running in the Adobe player, version
"LNX 11,2,202,261":
-- RUNNING TEST2 --
About to instanciate an SC2 now
XPASSED: ret == true [./XMLSocketTest.as:123]
ENDOFTEST
*** Security Sandbox Violation ***
Connection to FSCommand:quit halted - not permitted from file:///home/b
lockeduser/Documents/custom-software/gnash-dev/gnash/testsuite/misc-min
g.all/XMLSocketTest.swf
-- Browser scripting URLs may only be executed using the getURL and nav
igateToURL functions.
Warning: fail is not a function
Because the Adobe player did not seem to like the fail function, I
changed it to a trace. I got the same results but at the end of the
log, after some time, the following appeared:
instance onConnect called
===========================================================================
Here it is in gnash with the "alternate this" patch:
14529:1] 2474 TRACE: -- RUNNING TEST2 --
14529:1] 2474 TRACE: About to instanciate an SC2 now
14529:1] 2475 ERROR: Trying superclass prototype call hack
14529:1] 2475 SECURITY: Load from host localhost.localdomain granted (d
efault)
14529:1] 2627 ERROR: getaddrinfo() needed to change localhost, check yo
ur /etc/hosts file!
14529:1] 2628 TRACE: XPASSED: ret == true [./XMLSocketTest.as:123]
14529:1] 2628 TRACE: ENDOFTEST
PASSED: consistency check: last trace from run of test (ENDOFTEST) mat
ches pattern (ENDOFTEST)
I also tried running the alternate-this version without the code that
stops it when ENDOFTEST is reached and with "fail" replaced with "trace",
this resulted in the following additional trace:
23215:1] 2117 TRACE: SC1 prototype onConnect called
I believe this is indeed the incorrect behaviour that you mention.
Note: I have run the logs through "fold -71" to make them fit well
in the email format.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38084>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, (continued)
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/14
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Benjamin Wolsey, 2013/01/15
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/15
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/15
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/15
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/16
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/16
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/17
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/21
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/25
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure,
bl0ckeduser <=
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/27
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, Sandro Santilli, 2013/01/28
- [Gnash-commit] [bug #38084] Superclass prototype method call failure, bl0ckeduser, 2013/01/28