[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_f
From: |
Rob Savoye |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:34:46 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 09/07/11 10:24, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Would you accept this way of taking decisions or do you want to decide
> by yourself ? Or would you prefer unanimity ? We could even get unanimity
> if we accepted to discuss this w/out bias.
As the Gnash maintainer, I only make a decision when we can't come to
consensus. Normally, that waits till a disagreement goes on for a long
period of time... In this particular case, I will agree to letting you
change the FB GUI back to 'auto', although I dislike 'auto'. I won't
personally make this change, as I prefer the current behavior.
As far as double buffering goes, I just created a task (#11337) to
reimplement this in the near future. While some may consider this a
regression, I don't as all the FB code has changed heavily, and it was a
"feature" that nobody used anyway. Lets do ourselves a favor and stop
arguing over it.
- rob -
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/03
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51,
Rob Savoye <=
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Rob Savoye, 2011/09/07
- Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, hwaccel, updated. release_0_8_9_final-1154-ge290f51, Sandro Santilli, 2011/09/07