[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_st
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_start-39-gb5f9e24 |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:02:15 +0100 |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:57:26AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 02/11/11 03:54, strk wrote:
>
> > Would be nice to use the same program_options for both.
> > In that case we'll need a converter tool capable of porting
> > existing rcs to new format...
>
> Please don't even consider such a thing.
?
> For one thing, command line
> arguments work differently than config file settings of the same
> parameter. While we could easily improve our config file syntax, I don't
> see what the benefit would be, especially for people that only use it
> via the Preferences dialog.
The benefit would be you'd keep a single set of options definition
and such options could be specified in both config file or command
line w/out code duplication (program_options does it all).
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html