Re: [Gnash-commit] /srv/bzr/gnash/trunk r10032: Tests for missing Transform elements.

[strk]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 03:37:16PM +0200, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:

> +// Concatenated transform. Does this make any sense?
> +
> +conc1 = _root.createEmptyMovieClip("conc1", getNextHighestDepth());
> +conc2 = conc1.createEmptyMovieClip("conc2", getNextHighestDepth());
> +
> +conc1._x = 1.5;
> +conc2._x = 0.3;
> +xcheck_equals(conc1.transform.concatenatedMatrix.toString(), 
> "(a=0.993750035762787, b=0, c=0, d=0.993750035762787, tx=1.5, ty=2)");
> +xcheck_equals(conc2.transform.concatenatedMatrix.toString(), 
> "(a=0.993750035762787, b=0, c=0, d=0.993750035762787, tx=1.75, ty=2)");
> +conc2._width = 3;
> +conc1._height = 0.6;
> +xcheck_equals(conc1.transform.concatenatedMatrix.toString(), "(a=0, b=0, 
> c=0, d=0, tx=1.5, ty=2)");
> +xcheck_equals(conc2.transform.concatenatedMatrix.toString(), "(a=0, b=0, 
> c=0, d=0, tx=1.5, ty=2)");

Here you killed the matrix by setting _width or _height of a charactr with null 
bounds...
You should get the same behaviour by only setting either _width or _height, no 
need
to set both. Don't ask me why.
Actually, you may want to try setting _rotation and see if it has the same 
effect (I don't think so).

The 1.75 value above I'm not sure if it makes sense.
I'd try drawing something in those clips before messing with 'transform', if 
the test
is focused on 'transform'.

--strk;