|
From: | Xavier Hernandez |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] Help on pthread library error Handling! |
Date: | Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:40:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.9-200.fc20.x86_64; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Kotresh,
I have had to make a similar decision in the implementation of libgfsys [1]. Looking at what can fail in these function calls, it's clear that only a bug (i.e. a call to pthread_mutex_lock() with an uninitialized mutex or a bad pointer, or bad designed code) can generate an error. For this reason I decided to abort (using asserts) if this kind of calls fail. Anyway this shouldn't happen on released code (all these bugs should have been detected and corrected before releasing a version). Handling a failed pthread_mutex_lock() call can be tricky in some places.
However there are still some calls that can fail for other reasons not related to bugs, like pthread_mutex_init() if there aren't enough resources. These calls need to be handled correctly and propagate the error.
Xavi
[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/7521
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 08:37:36 Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: > Hi All, > > I am using pthread_mutex_lock in changelog translator which is part of brick > process (glusterfsd). I see that pthread errors are not being catched and > handled in current gluster code except in qemu where it is aborted. What is > the correct way to handle the error when pthread library routines fail in > gluster. Just logging the error and continuing would lead to data > corruption and deadlocks. Aborting the process will abort whole glusterfsd > process. > > > Thanks and Regards, > Kotresh H R > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > address@hidden > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |