gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Documentation expectations for 3.5 release


From: Vijay Bellur
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Documentation expectations for 3.5 release
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:17:47 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

On 04/15/2014 10:59 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 15/04/2014, at 6:46 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
<snip>
I do not think holding 3.5.0 back for documentation backlog that has not been 
covered earlier is right. I certainly think that there's no one stroke of the 
brush that can fix all our documentation limitations. Given that we have 
adequate information available (in some form) for features in 3.5, I am still 
inclined to move these bugs as blockers for 3.5.1 and go ahead with 3.5.0 as it 
exists today.

Where's the pressure coming from to release 3.5.0 without basic user
documentation for all features?

There is no pressure coming from anywhere but holding back code without doing releases is not good for _any_ community. We would definitely like to move to a more "release early, release often" model than just sitting on a lot of hard work that has gone in the form of developing and testing code.

I do not agree that we lack basic user documentation. As I mentioned in my previous mail, we do have some basic documentation available and it will only get better by 3.5.1.


Is there _actual pressure_ from a defined source (who I can speak to), or
is it something such as "we're really overdue already", etc?


Thanks for the offer to speak but I am not really looking for that since there is no such source :). Even with the hypothetical case of any such source being present, I feel that I can adequately represent the community and not let any of our interests down.

The real fact of the matter is that we have spent quite a lot of time in beta, we have postponed our GA by several weeks and holding it back because of inadequate documentation representation in admin guide does seem like a stretch to me.

-Vijay



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]