|
From: | Lalatendu Mohanty |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Possible memory leak ? |
Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2013 02:14:05 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 09/12/2013 07:01 AM, haiwei.xie-soulinfo wrote:
Do you have any back trace for the crash, log messages or anything that would help us debug the issue?hi, We meet memory leak in 3.4.0 & sambavfs. With mounting cifs, our application runs,'VIRT' of smbd process will increase untill oom-kill. using 'fsync/sync' or 'echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' can't resolve it. With mounting fuse, no memory leaks. I guess fuse API or samba-gluster-vfs has bug, any advise? Thanks,
-Lala
-terrsI'm aware of 2 different kinds of memory leaks on 3.3.1, one is in geo-replication and another one is native client side memory leak. Sadly both got mixed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841617 I can tell you that geo-replication leak is still present in 3.4.0 and native client leak isn't but I don't know what patch you need to backport :( On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John Ewing <address@hidden> wrote:Hi, I am using gluster 3.3.1 on Centos 6, installed from the glusterfs-3.3.1-1.el6.x86_64.rpm rpms. I am seeing the Committed_AS memory continually increasing and the processes using the memory are glusterfsd instances. see http://imgur.com/K3dalTW for graph. Both nodes are exhibiting the same behaviour, I have tried the suggested echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches but it made no difference. It there a known issue with 3.3.1 ? Thanks John _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list address@hidden http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |