Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs file replication question

[Krishna Srinivas]

Hi Roland,
The idea you want to use is correct, however afr does not handle
healing of holes
properly, we are working on it.
Regards
Krishna

On Feb 19, 2008 1:54 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> what if i combine AFR with Stripe Translator ?
>
> can this eventually help here?
>
> if i stripe a large file into several smaller parts and then open/write to 
> that large file - can i combine this with AFR and will all the parts of that 
> file be re-transmitted ?
>
> regards
> roland
>
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: <address@hidden>
> > Gesendet: 17.02.08 22:23:14
> > An: "Krishna Srinivas" <address@hidden>
>
> > CC: address@hidden
> > Betreff: Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs file replication question
>
>
> >
> > oh, that`s a real bandwidth killer / i/o hog then :)
> > think of 500gig disk with lot`s of large files , connected with 100mbit 
> > network.
> > if many of the files are open at the time of a node going down, that will 
> > take hours then for resync.
> >
> > is it planned to adress this to be handled more fficiently? for example 
> > just like fr1 from enbd ? 
> > (http://www.it.uc3m.es/ptb/nbd/#Intelligent_mirroring )
> >
> > regards
> > roland
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: "Krishna Srinivas" <address@hidden>
> > > Gesendet: 17.02.08 18:14:21
> > > An: address@hidden
> > > CC: address@hidden
> > > Betreff: Re: [Gluster-devel] glusterfs file replication question
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Roland,
> > > You are right. The entire file is copied.
> > > Krishna
> > >
> > > On Feb 17, 2008 5:12 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > hello !
> > > >
> > > > first off, i think glusterfs is great. i have waited/searched very long 
> > > > for something like this!
> > > > thanks for making it !
> > > >
> > > > i`m new to glusterfs and have a question:
> > > >
> > > > if i use afr to have redundant copies of files to be stored on 2 or 
> > > > more nodes - when one node goes down and comes back online - what does  
> > > > this mean regarding transferred amount of data for "resync" ?
> > > >
> > > > say i had 10 files open at the time of the crash of a node, and each of 
> > > > those files is sized 1gb - will the "resync" then transfer 10gb of data 
> > > > over the network, i.e. doing a complete copy from the working node to 
> > > > the previously failed one ?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > roland
> > > > sysadmin
> > > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Jetzt neu! Schützen Sie Ihren PC mit McAfee und WEB.DE. 30 Tage
> > > > kostenlos testen. http://www.pc-sicherheit.web.de/startseite/?mc=022220
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________
> Bis 50 MB Dateianhänge? Kein Problem!
> http://www.digitaledienste.web.de/freemail/club/lp/?lp=7
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>