[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Which mainline to use
From: |
Harris Landgarten |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Which mainline to use |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jul 2007 10:50:51 -0400 (EDT) |
Daniel,
I am running on Amazon EC2. In that environment, I can easily add machines but
have a fixed amount of cpu, memory and disk per machine. The application I am
running is Zimbra (www.zimbra.com). I am using glusterfs as a backend store for
Zimbra. I houses the email store for all emails over 30 days old. As such, this
is a read mostly environment. Every night backups run which read and write to
glusterfs intensively using a multi-threaded java async file copier. Hard links
are used as well. Glusterfs now handles this task perfectly and is very fast. I
have also tested gluster for HSM tasks which move emails over 30 days old from
primary storage to secondary storage.
I am not running an application directly on gluster because I am concerned
about latency in my enviroment. I will try to use gluster for more once AFR is
stable and am looking forward to the S3 Xlator.
Best,
Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel van Ham Colchete" <address@hidden>
To: "gluster-devel" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2007 10:33:52 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Which mainline to use
Harry,
I'm sorry for being so nosy, but could you please clarify something about
your production environment? The project I have been planning for 8 months
will go to production in less than 3 weeks. Because of the current AFR
status I'm between Gluster+HeartBeat+DRBD or NFS+Heartbeat+DRBD (without
anything like unify, witch is a minus). In the Gluster case I'll use
mainline-2.5.
Best regards,
Daniel Colchete
On 7/5/07, Harris Landgarten <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Einar,
>
> It depends on how you are using gluster. I am running 2.5 in a production
> environment but I only use unify, posix-locks, readahead, writebehind and
> io-threads. I would not use AFR yet with 2.5 since there is still some
> debugging happening but it seems to be getting very close. Others may have
> differing opinions.
>
> Best
>
> Harris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hans Einar Gautun" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2007 9:08:05 AM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
> Subject: [Gluster-devel] Which mainline to use
>
> Hi all,
> For production use, which mainline should I check out?
>
> BTW - got this error from make when compiling mailline 2.4 right now:
> ../../../libglusterfs/src/xlator.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xlator.o
> ../../../libglusterfs/src/xlator.c: In function 'xlator_set_type':
> ../../../libglusterfs/src/xlator.c:95: error: 'XLATORDIR' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Einar Gautun address@hidden
>
> Statens kartverk | Norwegian Mapping Authority
> 3507 Hønefoss | NO-3507 Hønefoss, Norway
>
> Ph +47 32118372 Fax +47 32118101 Mob +47 92692662
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel