[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gfsd]Re: Directory preamble

From: Bradley M. Kuhn
Subject: [gfsd]Re: Directory preamble
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:44:38 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

>    * We don't make any effort to write listings for such packages, but we
>    will include listings for them provided by their developers, as time
>    permits.

Janet Casey <address@hidden> wrote:

> I will therefore continue to write up only packages that are
> complete. Correct?

It seems to me your time is best spent writing up only finished packages
(save unfinished GNU programs), but we'd also accept entries written by
others on unfinished packages in a subdirectory.

I suggest calling the subdirectory "Unfinished".

> Also, at the last meeting you asked me to add unfinished GNU packages to
> the Directory. Do you want these to stay in the main Directory or go
> into the unfinished area?

I think that GNU programs that are unfinished should also go in

RMS, please confirm that these answers are ok with you.

   -- bkuhn

Attachment: pgpZz1MY1PDGr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]