[gfsd]Re: request for new mailing list: bug-cppi

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:

> RMS already knows about and approved it.  See below.
> The copyright assignment is on file, too.


The question is, though, should we make it part of indent (as RMS suggests),
and have bug-cppi and bug-indent go to the same place?

Could you perhaps coordinate with the maintainer of indent to both maintain
your parts, and share the job with the overall indent maintainer?

RMS: thoughts? 

>   Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 20:07:59 -0600 (MDT)
>   Message-Id: <address@hidden>
>   From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>   To: address@hidden
>   In-reply-to: <address@hidden> (message from Jim Meyering
>           on 03 Aug 2000 23:58:42 +0200)
>   Subject: Re: CPPI
>   References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
> 
>       | CPPI does a useful job, but I should ask: does indent do that job
>       | already?
> 
>       Not that I can see.
> 
>   Thanks for checking.  Given that the job isn't done already, I would
>   be glad to make CPPI a GNU program.
> 
>   But I think it will be a lot more useful if it is packaged with
>   Indent.  Then users would know where to find it!

pgp6uDi3I9opT.pgp
Description: PGP signature