gforth
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] After updating to Emacs 24.3, "Source file `/usr/local/shar


From: Mark J. Reed
Subject: Re: [gforth] After updating to Emacs 24.3, "Source file `/usr/local/share/emacs/site-list/gforth.el' newer than byte-compiled file"
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:23:09 -0400

I still don't understand why you have to have gforth to build gforth.  Why not 
bundle a mini-gforth written in C to do the bootstrapping?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 25, 2014, at 16:54, Bernd Paysan <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Am Dienstag, 25. März 2014, 14:49:46 schrieb Donald Winiecki:
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Bernd Paysan <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 25. März 2014, 12:53:53 schrieb Donald Winiecki:
>>>> Fresh git of gforth doesn't build for me without earlier gforth.
>>> 
>>> Sure, but you actually get a Gforth which you can use to build when you
>>> install the Debian package?  It just displays the annoying error message
>>> on
>>> install, which seems to stick in the package manager (which is annoying,
>>> but should go away once you have installed the gforth.el from fresh git).
>> Yes. It took a little looking around to figure out what to call things
>> to checkout (for example: v0-7-2), but I've got your latest changes in
>> gforth-0.7.2 now.  No errors about gforth.elc popped up in the
>> config-make-etc. process
> 
> Which repo did you use?  The one on Savanna and github should have v0-7-3 as 
> last tag in the v0-7 branch (the v0-7-4 tag will be added when I release 
> 0.7.4).
> 
>> I didn't find a more recent version (such as, v0-7-3, etc.) so I'm
>> confident I have your latest.
> 
> I'm confident you don't have my latest.
> 
> -- 
> Bernd Paysan
> "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
> http://bernd-paysan.de/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]