[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order?

From: Josh Grams
Subject: Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order?
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 05:34:03 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On 2013-04-26 01:58PM, Bernd Paysan wrote:
>I want Gforth to work as library in a C program, too.  That means
>I separated the startup process, and call bootmessage through
>gforth_find+gforth_execute before doing gforth_quit.

I thought that made perfect sense, but now I'm confused.  bootmessage is
already deferred -- why do you need to find/execute at runtime instead
of just allowing the deferred word to do its thing?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]