[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order?
|
From: |
Josh Grams |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 05:34:03 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On 2013-04-26 01:58PM, Bernd Paysan wrote:
>I want Gforth to work as library in a C program, too. That means
>I separated the startup process, and call bootmessage through
>gforth_find+gforth_execute before doing gforth_quit.
I thought that made perfect sense, but now I'm confused. bootmessage is
already deferred -- why do you need to find/execute at runtime instead
of just allowing the deferred word to do its thing?
--Josh