[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order?
From: |
Bernd Paysan |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] Must have Forth in search-order? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:58:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.7.10-1.1-desktop; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Donnerstag, 25. April 2013, 20:00:10 schrieb Josh Grams:
> If you pass code or a file on the command-line which produces a search
> order which does not contain FORTH-WORDLIST, recent CVS versions seem to
> crash before running bootmessage and accepting keyboard input.
>
> gforth -e 'wordlist 1 set-order'
>
> 0.7.0 was fine...so this is new at some point...
Yes, things changed a bit, because I want Gforth to work as library in a C
program, too. That means I separated the startup process, and call
bootmessage through gforth_find+gforth_execute before doing gforth_quit. I
added now code on Gforth git head that doesn't execute a notfound (0) return
value.
I.e. you won't get a bootmessage in your case, but it won't crash, either.
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.