Re: [gforth] gforthmi segmentation fault

[Bahman Movaqar]

"tathi" on #forth pointed me to the root of the problem.  I was
'2dup'ing on an empty stack and hence the error.

--
Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com)
ERP Evaluation, Implementation and Deployment Consultant


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 19:00, Bahman Movaqar <address@hidden> wrote:
> This is the source code I'm trying to make an image of:
> http://pastebin.com/b8R06Cur
>
> I hope it helps.
>
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 17:36, Bahman Movaqar <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm very new to Forth so please bear with me if I'm missing something
>> very obvious.
>>
>> Every time I run 'gforthmi' it chokes on 'segmentation fault' like below:
>>
>> address@hidden ussa]$ gforthmi ussa.fi ussa.fs
>>  redefined block-offset
>>
>>  Segmentation fault.
>>  redefined block-offset
>>
>>  Segmentation fault.
>>  redefined th
>>  *OS command line*:-1: No such file or directory
>>  comp-image >>>./temp-image.fi1<<< ./temp-image.fi2 ussa.fi bye
>>  Backtrace:
>>  $7F7C1A6DE850 throw
>>  $7F7C1A714408 slurp-file
>>  chmod: cannot access `ussa.fi': No such file or directory
>>  rm: cannot remove `./temp-image.fi1': No such file or directory
>>  rm: cannot remove `./temp-image.fi2': No such file or directory
>>
>> Though it works well with an empty source file.
>>
>> address@hidden Temp]$ touch foo.fs
>> address@hidden Temp]$ gforthmi foo.fi foo.fs
>>  redefined th  data offset=43CCF071C0
>>  code offset=-1767F30
>>     xt offset=-1767F50
>>         60     7F1BB8424000     7F5F8532B000
>>         68     7F1BB8429000     7F5F85330000
>>         70     7F1BB842E000     7F5F85335000
>>         78     7F1BB8433000     7F5F8533A000
>>     2F58     7F1BB8428000     7F5F8532F000
>>     2F60     7F1BB8431C00     7F5F85338C00
>>     2F68     7F1BB842D000     7F5F85334000
>>     2F78     7F1BB8431B30     7F5F85338B30
>>     2F80     7F1BB8431B28     7F5F85338B28
>>     2F98          2456480           CEE480
>>     4DC0     7F1BB7B817C0     7F5F84A887C0
>>     4DF8     7F1BB7B818A0     7F5F84A888A0
>>    10C70     7FFF31EDD640     7FFF4A239730
>>    10CD8     7FFF31EDD858     7FFF4A239948
>>    11B80          2462840           CFA840
>>    13958          247BB10           D13B10
>>    1CB68          2470900           D08900
>>    1CC08          2462F20           CFAF20
>>    27E38          2472F60           D0AF60
>>    2BE20          24731A0           D0B1A0
>>    3C8B8          247B4B0           D134B0
>>
>> I tested the above on both a 64bit and a 32bit machines and the
>> results were exactly the same.
>> What am I doing wrong?  Is it possible that my source code is the
>> reason for this?
>>
>> I'd appreciate any hint/help.  TIA,