Re: [gforth] gforthmi segmentation fault

[Bahman Movaqar]

This is the source code I'm trying to make an image of:
http://pastebin.com/b8R06Cur

I hope it helps.

--
Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com)
ERP Evaluation, Implementation and Deployment Consultant


On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 17:36, Bahman Movaqar <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very new to Forth so please bear with me if I'm missing something
> very obvious.
>
> Every time I run 'gforthmi' it chokes on 'segmentation fault' like below:
>
> address@hidden ussa]$ gforthmi ussa.fi ussa.fs
>  redefined block-offset
>
>  Segmentation fault.
>  redefined block-offset
>
>  Segmentation fault.
>  redefined th
>  *OS command line*:-1: No such file or directory
>  comp-image >>>./temp-image.fi1<<< ./temp-image.fi2 ussa.fi bye
>  Backtrace:
>  $7F7C1A6DE850 throw
>  $7F7C1A714408 slurp-file
>  chmod: cannot access `ussa.fi': No such file or directory
>  rm: cannot remove `./temp-image.fi1': No such file or directory
>  rm: cannot remove `./temp-image.fi2': No such file or directory
>
> Though it works well with an empty source file.
>
> address@hidden Temp]$ touch foo.fs
> address@hidden Temp]$ gforthmi foo.fi foo.fs
>  redefined th  data offset=43CCF071C0
>  code offset=-1767F30
>     xt offset=-1767F50
>         60     7F1BB8424000     7F5F8532B000
>         68     7F1BB8429000     7F5F85330000
>         70     7F1BB842E000     7F5F85335000
>         78     7F1BB8433000     7F5F8533A000
>     2F58     7F1BB8428000     7F5F8532F000
>     2F60     7F1BB8431C00     7F5F85338C00
>     2F68     7F1BB842D000     7F5F85334000
>     2F78     7F1BB8431B30     7F5F85338B30
>     2F80     7F1BB8431B28     7F5F85338B28
>     2F98          2456480           CEE480
>     4DC0     7F1BB7B817C0     7F5F84A887C0
>     4DF8     7F1BB7B818A0     7F5F84A888A0
>    10C70     7FFF31EDD640     7FFF4A239730
>    10CD8     7FFF31EDD858     7FFF4A239948
>    11B80          2462840           CFA840
>    13958          247BB10           D13B10
>    1CB68          2470900           D08900
>    1CC08          2462F20           CFAF20
>    27E38          2472F60           D0AF60
>    2BE20          24731A0           D0B1A0
>    3C8B8          247B4B0           D134B0
>
> I tested the above on both a 64bit and a 32bit machines and the
> results were exactly the same.
> What am I doing wrong?  Is it possible that my source code is the
> reason for this?
>
> I'd appreciate any hint/help.  TIA,
>
> --
> Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com)
> ERP Evaluation, Implementation and Deployment Consultant