Re: [gforth] [IF] .. [ELSE] .. [THEN] implementation question

[Bernd Paysan]

Anton Ertl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Josh Grams wrote:
> > In kernel/toolsext.fs, is there a reason why the definition of [ELSE] in
> > [struct]-voc (at line 40) is not immediate?  All the others are...
>
> There appears to be, because if I make it immediate, too, Gforth
> breaks.  It's unclear to me what the reason is, though.  Maybe Bernd
> can shed some light on it.

As far as I can see, it is immediate, the immediate is just a line 
below.  Maybe double-immediate is harmful, this quite likely hasn't been 
tested in cross.fs ;-).

--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/