[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:07:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, Jan 13 2011, Mark Harig wrote:
>>
>> No, i dpn't think so. They actually already differ substantially from
>> complete-symbol. In the first place, completion is done by
>> completion-at-point (which has no C-u variant); moreover,
>> geiser-repl--tab will indent or go to the next error (instead of
>> completing), depending on context.
>
> It might be appropriate to change the name of `geiser-repl--tab' to
> `geiser-repl-dwim-tab', given its three-features behavior (to be
> expanded to four?).
Good idea. I'll do that, and introduce C-u TAB later today or tomorrow.
jao
--
At bottom, every man knows perfectly well that he is a unique being, only
once on this earth; and by no extraordinary chance will such a marvelously
picturesque piece of diversity in unity as he is, ever be put together a
second time. -Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900)
- [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Mark Harig, 2011/01/10
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2011/01/11
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Mark Harig, 2011/01/11
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2011/01/12
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Mark Harig, 2011/01/12
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Jose A. Ortega Ruiz, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Mark Harig, 2011/01/13
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding,
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz <=
- Re: [Geiser-users] Overriding the M-[backquote] key binding, Mark Harig, 2011/01/13