[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Geiser-users] Possible key binding optimization
From: |
Jose A. Ortega Ruiz |
Subject: |
Re: [Geiser-users] Possible key binding optimization |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:48:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, Jan 12 2011, Mark Harig wrote:
>>
>> > Does C-c C-d C-i (bound to `geiser-doc-look-up-manual') have some
>> > extra capability beyond C-h S (bound to `info-lookup-symbol')?
>>
>> Yes. C-c C-d C-i is equivalent to a info manual lookup only for Guile.
>> In Racket, the command implementation is totally different. The same
>> will happen when/if Geiser supports other Scheme implementations not
>> offering texinfo manuals.
>>
>
> Ah, of course. That's a very good reason. It's unfortunate that
> Racket does not provide Info files or .texinfo or .tex (TeX) files,
> but that can't be helped.
>
> I would still like to recommend the behavior of `info-lookup-symbol'
> for `geiser-doc-look-up-manual'. My strong preference when looking up
> documentation is for point to remain where it is in the code while
> displaying the documentation in a separate (and, if needed, new)
> window. With Geiser's behavior, I'll start two windows, one with code
> and one with documentation, but when I invoke
> `geiser-doc-look-up-manual', I then have two windows with
> documentation and none with code. Having both code and documentation
> available at the same time is useful because it lets me examine both
> without having to switch back and forth.
You can already get that behaviour by customizing
geiser-guile-manual-lookup-other-window-p.
Cheers,
jao
--
Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it.
Geniuses remove it.
- Alan Perlis, Epigrams in Programing