gdb in inline functions

[icegood]

Why gdb sssso ugly when has deal with inline functions? 

Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 2.
Error accessing memory address 0x115: Input/Output error.

Why rather gcc so ugly with them? Why you just not substitute inlining with
non-inlining ones but with different names overriding 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling Name mangling ???

Like you did before overriding breakpoints for template functions? And no
linker errors while compiling!
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/gdb-in-inline-functions-tp28659355p28659355.html
Sent from the Gnu - gdb - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.