[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gcmd-dev] [NEW] New user action for bookmark accessing
From: |
Piotr Eljasiak |
Subject: |
Re: [gcmd-dev] [NEW] New user action for bookmark accessing |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:51:08 +0200 |
> Piotr:
> > for local bookmarks
> >
> > KEY=bookmarks.goto|bookmark_name
> > or
> > KEY=bookmarks.goto|local|bookmark_name
>
> I've ever seen the second path only, does it mean the 'local' can be omitted ?
Yep.
> Since there's only one bookmark group and no manager yet.
> Can i have more groups by hacking the config ? Like [newname_bookmarks].
Currently there 2 groups: local and samba. I know it should be more like
shortcut to a location, but changing that requires LOTS of code modification.
We'll get back to more general bookmarking after finishing support for the
missing protocols (sftp, webdav, ...)
> > Nonexistent bookmark names are reported to stdout and then ignored
>
> There's a reproducible bug if users enter wrong keys.
> I made a mistake and set up <meta>g when i meant <alt>g, and after closing
> gcmd the <meta> got deleted so only 'g' was left. That's a nice approach but
> maybe dangerous in special situations.
So gcmd should report about unknown mofifiers and ignore them, right?
And just FYI:
gcmd supports now 4 type of modifiers:
<shift> --> GDK_SHIFT_MASK;
<control> --> GDK_CONTROL_MASK;
<alt> --> GDK_MOD1_MASK;
<win> --> GDK_MOD4_MASK;
with 2 aliases
<mod1> --> GDK_MOD1_MASK;
<mod4> --> GDK_MOD4_MASK;
Piotr