[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:20:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Greetings!
Raymond Toy <address@hidden> writes:
> On 11/8/10 11:49 AM, Camm Maguire wrote:
>> Greetings! OK, that's enough for me -- GCL's migration to LGPLv3
>> will not occur until maxima and acl2 choose to do so as well, if
>> ever.
>
> I may be mistaken. Looking through the maxima archives, there's a
> thread about GPLv3 from June 1, 2008. It seems maxima is gplv2 or
> later. The COPYING file does say any later version, and as far as we
> can tell Bill Schelter never specified a GPL version for maxima.
>
> I am not a lawyer. And the fact that we can't tell doesn't mean Bill
> Schelter never specified a version. It just means we can't easily find
> anything saying one way or another.
>
Thanks so much for pointing this out. If indeed the maxima files
currently state v2 or later, then I think this at least presents no
problem.
Take care,
> Ray
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/04
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Donald Winiecki, 2010/11/04
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/05
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Raymond Toy, 2010/11/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Matt Kaufmann, 2010/11/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Camm Maguire, 2010/11/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Matt Kaufmann, 2010/11/08
- [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing, Raymond Toy, 2010/11/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.8 licensing,
Camm Maguire <=