[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL
From: |
Matt Kaufmann |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Aug 2010 02:34:29 -0500 |
Hi, Camm --
Thanks for the fix! At one time, that same form (setq
si::*multiply-stacks* 2), also failed on Windows. Does it work on
Windows now?
I haven't forgotten to get you a fix for the issue of moving .cert
files in ACL2. I have a fix, but I'm considering just doing a new
ACL2 release. Let me know if you have any particular timetable for
getting the fix.
Thanks --
-- Matt
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
From: Camm Maguire <address@hidden>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:53:49 -0400
X-MagicMail-UUID: 5af74938-a361-11df-b7c3-000c29c6406d
X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-282 required=165
Greetings!
Matt Kaufmann <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi, Camm --
>
> I've just grabbed the latest cvs version of GCL 2.6.8pre and built
> ACL2 with it, on my Intel Mac running Mac OS 10.6.4. The build
> succeeded, as did a run of the ACL2 regression suite (using a
> development copy of ACL2, not much different from ACL2 4.0) -- well,
> almost. (But almost is still great -- thanks!) Here's the story.
>
> I first removed the progn form near the end of source file init.lisp
> that contains the form
>
> (setq si::*multiply-stacks* 2)
>
> because that form caused an error (though maybe the build would have
> succeeded; I'm not sure). Here's a simple log from my Mac, not
> involving ACL2:
>
Thanks for spotting this -- looks like its very old. In any case,
should be fixed now. Please let me know if problems persist.
Take care,
> ~$ /Users/kaufmann/lisps/gcl/gcl-2.6.8pre/unixport/saved_gcl
> GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.6.8 CLtL1 Aug 6 2010 11:51:51
> Source License: LGPL(gcl,gmp), GPL(unexec,bfd,xgcl)
> Binary License: GPL due to GPL'ed components: (READLINE UNEXEC)
> Modifications of this banner must retain notice of a compatible license
> Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter
>
> Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL.
> Temporary directory for compiler files set to
/var/folders/6S/6ScqCriVFE8aH0vpDjfNK++++TI/-Tmp-/
>
> >(setq si::*multiply-stacks* 2)
>
> 2
>
> >
> Error: Caught fatal error [memory may be damaged]
> Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging
> Error signalled by an anonymous function.
>
> Error: 4 is an illegal ihs index.
> Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging
> Error signalled by SYSTEM:UNIVERSAL-ERROR-HANDLER.
> Broken at SYSTEM:SCH-FRS-BASE.
> >>>:b
> Backtrace: system:universal-error-handler > SYSTEM:SCH-FRS-BASE
> NIL
> >>>
>
> Perhaps there's a different way I should increase stack size? One
> regression test failed, namely books/serialize/serialize-tests.lisp,
> with "Invocation history stack overflow.". I'm guessing it's because
> I didn't double the stack size, though I'm not sure.
>
> Thanks --
> -- Matt
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, Robert Krug <address@hidden>
> From: Camm Maguire <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:12:15 -0400
> X-SpamAssassin-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0
> X-UTCS-Spam-Status: No, hits=-252 required=165
>
> Greetings! Wonderful to hear from you too!
>
> "Warren A. Hunt Jr." <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi Camm,
> >
> > It's good to hear that you are back at work on GCL.
> >
> > It appears we're getting close to a gcl release. You might recall
out
> > [typo?; probably should be be "our"]
> > having used static builds in the past to enable 32bit linux machines
> > to use up to 3gig memory as opposed to the usual 1gig limit (imposed
> > by the load address of shared libraries.) Warren told me at one
time
> > that this was useful in getting the most out of 32bit, especially as
> > 64bit comes with its own overhead of bigger pointers. In addition,
> > the binary of course is completely portable. Is this important to
> > support? There appear to have been some libc developments which
will
> > have to be worked around to get it working now.
> >
> > I believe there will be interest in 32-bit computing
> > for many years to come; I believe the embedded world of
> > computing will become almost entirely based on 32-bit
> > ARM and X86 platforms. The number of embedded systems
> > (phones, tablets, set-top boxes, utility meters, etc.)
> > far exceeds the number of general-purpose computing
> > systems. For instance, the device that measures the
> > electric power used in my home is an embedded Linux
> > system running on a Pico ITX board with a X86
> > processor. So, for embedded computing, I think getting
> > what one can from the 32-bit X86 architecture is
> > valuable.
> >
> > Some years ago, Boyer and I didn't have ready access to
> > 64-bit computers so we were motivated to get as much
> > out of our 32-bit computers as possible. However, now
> > even my laptop contains a 64-bit (Intel Core 2 Duo)
> > microprocessor with 8 GBytes RAM, so now I always work
> > on a 64-bit machine. Therefore, I don't expect to be a
> > future customer of 32-bit GCL for general-purpose
> > computing.
> >
>
> Good thing then I guess that I put in the extra work to get 64bit
> working on the mac. There is a special configure option needed as
> explained in README.macosx. The standard configure tools detect the
> box as 32bit by default.
>
> In any case, this mac stuff appears done now. If anyone finds it
> useful enough to try it out and report back, that of course would be
> great. No need of course unless it is of genuine use to some real mac
> user.
>
> Take care,
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Warren
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Camm Maguire address@hidden
>
==========================================================================
> "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." --
Baha'u'llah
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2010/08/06
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, George W. Dinolt, 2010/08/06
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2010/08/06
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2010/08/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2010/08/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2010/08/13
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2010/08/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2010/08/08
[Gcl-devel] Re: 32bit GCL, Camm Maguire, 2010/08/08