gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Minor? problem making gcl-2.6.8pre on a Mac


From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Minor? problem making gcl-2.6.8pre on a Mac
Date: 15 Jan 2008 13:47:07 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Greetings!

"Donald Winiecki" <address@hidden> writes:

> Thanks Gaby, for the command like to get make.log, though for some
> reason, it's still not being created.  I listed the make process to the
> screen and culled through it but don't find the same error that Raymond
> is describing below on a Win32 build.
> 

This is because the issue is in xgcl-2, which is omitted on windows as
there is no X.

Take care,

> _don  
> 
> >>> Donald Winiecki 1/13/2008 10:02:28 PM >>>
> This looks similar to what is happening in the Win32 build of 2.6.8pre
> (no gcl.bat file created), though for some reason I'm not getting the
> log file written when I run 'make,' so I can't confirm the error or
> error location during the process (the 'install.lsp' file isn't being
> loaded and this is what's stopping the 'gcl.bat' file from being created
> during the Win32 build).  
> 
> I can confirm that 'saved_gcl.exe' is created in the Win32 build (cltl1
> version), so something else is happening with the Macintosh build when
> it comes to that.
> 
> I'll look into why I'm not getting a make.log, and when I can get one
> created I'll check for something similar to what Jeff is reporting.
> 
> _don winiecki
> 
> >>> Raymond Toy <address@hidden> 1/13/2008 8:29:25 PM >>>
> address@hidden wrote:
> > Everything seemed to go well until:
> > XLIB>pdflatex dwdoc.tex
> > make[1]: pdflatex: Command not found
> > make[1]: *** [dwdoc.pdf] Error 127
> > make: *** [unixport/saved_gcl] Error 2
> > 
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > 
> > I ended up with no "gcl" script in "bin", and
> > no unixport/saved_gcl, though there is a unixport/saved_pre_gcl.
> 
> I just commented out the dependency to dwdoc.pdf.  Then the build 
> finishes and creates the expected binaries.  I don't know what is 
> missing (other than the pdf file) if you don't build dwdoc.pdf.
> 
> Unless dwdoc.pdf is really, really necessary, I think it would be
> better 
> to separate the building of the executable from the building of the 
> pdf/documentation files.
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden 
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]