Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: LAMBDA-PARAMETERS-LIMIT, fyi

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings, and thanks for your input!  It would probably be a good
idea to eventually get libffi (sp?) support, but I think this is a bit
further down on the priority list at the moment, if that is OK with
you. 

Take care,

"Robert Dodier" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello, sorry for the late reply. I don't know if this topic has gone anywhere
> in the meantime. Anyway here is my $0.02.
> 
> 
> On 16 May 2006 17:48:24 -0400, Camm Maguire <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Greetings!  Is this a problem?
> >
> > Take care,
> >
> > Robert Boyer <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > Some other values of                                
> > > LAMBDA-PARAMETERS-LIMIT
> > >
> > > Armed Bear Common Lisp 0.0.8                        50
> > > GCL 2.7.0 ANSI                                      64
> > > Clisp (c) Sam Steingold, Bruno Haible 2001-2005     4096
> > > Allegro 7.0                                         16384
> > > SBCL 0.9.8                                          536870911
> 
> I would like to see the maxima number of arguments be made
> as large as possible. It is common enough in math stuff to want
> to apply some operation to a long list of arguments.
> 
> For what it's worth,
> Robert Dodier
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah