|
From: | Raymond Toy |
Subject: | [Gcl-devel] Re: [Fwd: Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection] |
Date: | Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:55:24 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) |
Camm Maguire wrote:
Raymond Toy writes:On the sparc port, this area can be zeroed out with appropriate optimization settings. I ran some tests using Eric Marsden's cl-bench. If the stack is always cleared, the cost of some benchmarks go up, but some go down, because the cost of GC is decreased. (The benchmarks include GC time.)Thanks for the tip -- does this use gcc, and if so, what is the
You know, of course, that CMUCL is a native compiler that doesn't use gcc. I hand-wrote the assembly code to clear the stack area. :-)
Ray
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |