[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?
From: |
Nicolas Neuss |
Subject: |
Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug? |
Date: |
26 Jul 2004 17:18:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Nicolas Neuss <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I want to proceed as follows:
> > >
> > > 1. Setup the most ANSI-compatible version of GCL
> > > 2. Setup defsystem.
> > > 3. Setup infix.
> > > 4. Look where I get hung for the first time with compiling Femlisp.
> > >
> >
> > CVS head is quite a bit more ansi compliant, but it is much more of a
> > moving target. Personally, I recommend applications use the stable
> > branch if they can so we can concentrate on cvs head without worrying
> > about breakage.
>
> OK, I used 2.6.3 now. I succeeded in compiling and loading both infix and
> mk-defsystem after adding the nickname "COMMON-LISP" to the "LISP" package.
> Now I get stopped with
>
> (let ((directory (pathname-directory *femlisp-pathname*)))
> (setf (logical-pathname-translations "FEMLISP")
> `(("**;*.*.*"
> ,(make-pathname :directory `(,@directory :wild-inferiors)
> :name :wild :type :wild :version :wild)))))
>
> because the function LOGICAL-PATHNAME-TRANSLATIONS is not defined. Is
> there a substitute for this function or should I wait for gcl-2.7.0?
>
> Yours, Nicolas.
I have proceeded a little further by setting the pathname to be an ordinary
string. Unfortunately, now MK:OOS yields an error:
>(mk:oos 'femlisp 'compile :minimal-load t :verbose t :compile-during-load t)
Error: MAKE::IGNORE-ERRORS is invalid as a function.
...
I thought that defsystem would work with GCL. Is this wrong? At least,
#+GCL appears in the file defsystem.lisp...
Thanks, Nicolas.
- [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/19
- FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Mike Thomas, 2004/07/19
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/23
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Camm Maguire, 2004/07/23
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/26
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?,
Nicolas Neuss <=
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Dennis Decker Jensen, 2004/07/26
- RE: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Mike Thomas, 2004/07/26
- RE: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, James Amundson, 2004/07/26
- RE: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Mike Thomas, 2004/07/26
- RE: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Mike Thomas, 2004/07/26
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/27
- Re: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Nicolas Neuss, 2004/07/27
- RE: FW: [Gcl-devel] Floating-point performance of GCL? Bug?, Mike Thomas, 2004/07/28
[Gcl-devel] Away from email for a week, Camm Maguire, 2004/07/23