[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results |
Date: |
28 Jun 2004 11:10:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Thanks for this, Vadim! As you can tell I decided not to post this
additional example to the release notes page for simplicity reasons.
It is clear that there is a fair degree of noise in these numbers.
The broad conclusion of your run below is basically the same -- the
median and geometric mean of the gcl runtimes are slightly lower than
those for cmucl. All we are and should be claiming given the state of
this imperfect science is that 'gcl is *about as fast* as cmucl', a
statement which of course will vary given the task at hand, but which
appears to be broadly supported by these results in aggregate.
Take care,
"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire writes:
> > Greetings!
> > "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>Camm Maguire writes:
> >>
> >>>Greetings!
> >>>Thanks Vadim! Have added this result to the page. Please give it a
> >>>look over for possible errors.
> >>>Take care,
> >>
> >>Minor correction. Table heading reads: CMUCL 18e-9,
> >>CLISP 2.33-2 - these are Debian package release numbers.
> >>But I use my own ALT Linux builds so maybe just
> >>CMUCL 18e and CLISP 2.33.1 would be more precise.
> >>
> > OK, done.
> >
> >>I think it is good idea to put your gabliel.tgz
> >>somewhere on GCL Savannah site and provide reference.
> >>Let's everyone who cares get it and check our
> >>results.
> >>
> > I wanted to commit them to the cvs tree, but there does not appear to
> > be a permissible license/copyright anywhere. Richard Gabriel offers a
> > pdf of the book from which these were taken on his website under the
> > 'creative commons' license, which, to my understanding, is not
> > compatible with the (L)GPL as it forbids commercial use.
> > I will try to contact him for clarification.
> > Take care,
> >
> >>I'd like to repeat gabriel test suite on yet one
> >>more machine with Pentium III CPU - I have some
> >>733Mhz one near at hand.
> >>
> >>
>
> Yet another banchmark now with Pentium III
>
> Pentium III 733MHz, Linux 2.4.22, 384Mb
>
> GCL 2.6.2 ANSI CMUCL 18e CMU/GCL
>
> BOYER 21.420 23.280 1.087
> BROWSE 48.450 53.020 1.094
> CTAK 4.260 2.040 0.479
> DDERIV 17.470 18.040 1.033
> DERIV 15.880 12.000 0.756
> DESTRU-MOD 16.720 15.220 0.910
> DESTRU 23.500 15.230 0.648
> DIV2 16.430 12.840 0.781
> FFT-MOD 1.020 1.920 1.882
> FFT 0.980 1.930 1.969
> FPRINT 9.480 27.500 2.901
> FREAD 5.770 12.160 2.107
> FRPOLY 57.030 60.200 1.056
> PUZZLE-MOD 6.390 66.030 10.333
> PUZZLE 6.770 63.580 9.391
> STAK 10.030 15.560 1.551
> TAK-MOD 7.230 8.720 1.206
> TAK 7.300 8.890 1.218
> TAKL 2.710 4.550 1.679
> TAKR 4.120 5.240 1.271
> TPRINT 17.950 29.150 1.624
> TRAVERSE 169.100 106.000 0.627
> TRIANG-MOD 133.470 885.950 6.638
> TRIANG 149.620 157.240 1.051
>
>
> -------------- SESSION ------------------
>
> For gcl Common Lisp
> ??? ??? 23 22:14:58 MSD 2004
>
> BOYER 21.420
> BROWSE 48.450
> CTAK 4.260
> DDERIV 17.470
> DERIV 15.880
> DESTRU-MOD 16.720
> DESTRU 23.500
> DIV2 16.430
> FFT-MOD 1.020
> FFT 0.980
> FPRINT 9.480
> FREAD 5.770
> FRPOLY 57.030
> PUZZLE-MOD 6.390
> PUZZLE 6.770
> STAK 10.030
> TAK-MOD 7.230
> TAK 7.300
> TAKL 2.710
> TAKR 4.120
> TPRINT 17.950
> TRAVERSE 169.100
> TRIANG-MOD 133.470
> TRIANG 149.620
>
> -------------- SESSION ------------------
>
> For lisp Common Lisp
> ??? ??? 23 22:29:31 MSD 2004
>
> BOYER 23.280
> BROWSE 53.020
> CTAK 2.040
> DDERIV 18.040
> DERIV 12.000
> DESTRU-MOD 15.220
> DESTRU 15.230
> DIV2 12.840
> FFT-MOD 1.920
> FFT 1.930
> FPRINT 27.500
> FREAD 12.160
> FRPOLY 60.200
> PUZZLE-MOD 66.030
> PUZZLE 63.580
> STAK 15.560
> TAK-MOD 8.720
> TAK 8.890
> TAKL 4.550
> TAKR 5.240
> TPRINT 29.150
> TRAVERSE 106.000
> TRIANG-MOD 885.950
> TRIANG 157.240
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> It looks like Pentium 4 (I mean 2.4GHz Xeon) desn't
> like some CMUCL tests.
>
> BTW, on Athlon I've tried -march=i586 vs -march=athlon
> but found no difference.
>
> --
> Vadim V. Zhytnikov
>
> <address@hidden>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Michael Koehne, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results,
Camm Maguire <=
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/06/21
[Gcl-devel] Re: Boyer benchmark results, Eric Marsden, 2004/06/28