Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings!  I've taken a stab at some verbiage n the release notes
> > page:
> > http://people.debian.org/~camm/GCL_2_6_2_tests.html
> > I'm writing this as always too quickly, late at night, being short on
> > time.  I'd greatly appreciate suggestions and comments/edits.
> > Specifically, I want to make sure we don't overstate the condition of
> > GCL, yet I feel we need to state clearly where possible and fair GCL's
> > strong points to help ameliorate the prevailing somewhat negative
> > impression of our project.
> 
> Camm,
> 
>    There's still something wrong with your benchmarks on cmucl.
> I'm told that in cl-bench cmucl (and sbcl) run about 10x faster
> than clisp on the BOYER test, but in your figures the ratio is smaller.
> 
>    Can we just use cl-bench?
> 

OK, I'm looking into it.  I've written separately on this issue, and
of course would always appreciate your very helpful feedback.

Take care,

>       Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah