[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2 |
Date: |
21 Jun 2004 13:08:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings!
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Vadim V. Zhytnikov wrote:
>
> > # GCL is about as robust/correct as CLISP
> > seems to be misleading a bit. What do you mean
> > by "robust/correct" ? I know that have random
> > tester in mind but it is not so clear for casual
> > user. So maybe something like
>
> GCL certainly is not as *compliant* as CLISP at this point.
>
Yes, I tried to make this clear in the last bullet point. Please let
me know if you think it needs further emphasis.
>
> > # GCL compiler is about as robust/correct as CLISP one
> > would be better.
>
> And specify that this is under the random tester, since the
> random tester does not test all of lisp, just a mostly
> integer subset.
OK, done. Please let me know if there are further inadequacies.
Take care,
>
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
[Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/18
[Gcl-devel] Re: 2.6.2, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/06/18
[Gcl-devel] 2.6.2, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/25