gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: GCL produces wrong EOL on mingw


From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: GCL produces wrong EOL on mingw
Date: 20 Mar 2004 14:07:21 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

Greetings!

Mike Thomas <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi everyone.
> 
> I am not getting these file name errors with CVS Maxima and stable CVS
> ANSI GCL.  If someone can show me how to reproduce it on W2000 or XP I
> can have a look.
> 
> Are they related to the CLtL1 build or a particular OS?  Is anyone
> getting them now?
> 
> The only serious bug I can report at present is the ANSI test crash
> which I have tried to isolate a couple of times including this morning
> without success.  I'm happy to ignore it for 2.6.2 unless someone can
> find a quick fix, especially as the HEAD branch exhibits different,
> less severe, problems in the test.
> 

Can you report both results showing their differences?


> As to whether it is related to CT/LF issues , who would know.  I would
> expect it to be one off instead of two.

OK, just to be clear, you don't see filename corruption which using
(ignore-errors ... on non-existent files, right?

> 
> On Monday I intend checking in the changes made during the installer
> saga, putting out a test package and then crossing my fingers for a
> merciful end to 2.6.2.

Great!

Take care,

> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mike Thomas.
> 
> 
> Camm Maguire wrote:
> 
> >Greetings, and thanks for the pointer!  Mike, is this still extant?
> >Can you link this to anything else at all, especially a call to GBC?
> >Since the overlap always appears to be 2 chars wide, could this be
> >elated to the cr/lf problems we've been seeing?
> >
> >Take care,
> >
> >"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Camm Maguire ?????:
> >>
> >>>Hi Vadim!  Can you give an example or pointer to a discussion on the
> >>>lists?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Here you are!
> >>
> >>http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2003/006442.html
> >>http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/2004/006552.html
> >>
> >>
> >>>Take care,
> >>>"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Camm Maguire ?????:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Great!  Thanks for the feedback.  Any remaining windows problems you
> >>>>>may observe are very helpful at present especially.
> >>>>>Take care,
> >>>>>"Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)"
> >>>>><address@hidden> writes:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>From: Vadim V. Zhytnikov
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>At the end of mingw.h there is macro WRITEC_NEWLINE
> >>>>>>>defined as \r\n.  This macro should be commented out.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>This works for me and fixes a couple of maxima problems:
> >>>>>>- describe() now works
> >>>>>>- demo() now works
> >>>>>>- xmaxima looks better
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>Well, there is this issue with spurious file names
> >>>>with ignore-errors during Maxima build.
> >>>>This is not _terribly_ urgent since workaround
> >>>>for Maxima exist and works well.  Shell we try to
> >>>>fix the bug before release?  I don't know.
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>>     Vadim V. Zhytnikov
> >>>>
> >>>>      <address@hidden>
> >>>>     <address@hidden>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Gcl-devel mailing list
> >>>>address@hidden
> >>>>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> -- 
> >>      Vadim V. Zhytnikov
> >>
> >>       <address@hidden>
> >>      <address@hidden>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Gcl-devel mailing list
> >>address@hidden
> >>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]