[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables |
Date: |
20 Mar 2004 14:05:17 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings, and please let me thank both you and Sam for bringing this
to our attention. I'll try to take a look, most likely most 2.6.2.
Take care,
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Mike Thomas wrote:
> > I tried duplicating the symbol table problem on a Windows XP box with a
> > pre-release of the ANSI GCL 2.6.2 but could not get that explosion in time
> > you report after more than 30 iterations, as shown below.
>
> Still, you get a heavy slowdown, by a factor of 7 in your case:
>
> > >(time (fill-symtab 10000))
> >
> > real time : 0.367 secs
> > run time : 0.367 secs
> > NIL
> > ...
> > >(time (fill-symtab 10000))
> >
> > real time : 2.467 secs
> > run time : 2.467 secs
> > NIL
>
> So the bug is still there in your 2.6.2-pre build.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/08
- RE: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Mike Thomas, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables,
Camm Maguire <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Sam Steingold, 2004/03/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] efficiency of package symbol tables, Bruno Haible, 2004/03/23