Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!  OK, that's our bogey.  We're at about 80k now and counting
with no failures on the 1000 size.

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> 
> > OK.  Paul, what is the longest run (of this size) you've had with
> > clisp with no failure?
> 
> After they fixed the last compiler bug, I ran it for 525,000 iterations
> on forms of size 1000, and 42,000 iterations on forms of size 10,000,
> with no failures.  I've run it a bit more since then with no more
> failures.
> 
> IIRC, the random tester found a dozen bugs in clisp, and all have
> been fixed.
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah