[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output
From: |
Paul F. Dietz |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:19:43 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 |
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings! OK I guess your machine doesn't speak gzip.
I've placed the uncompressed file at
http://people.debian.org/~camm/e.out
Thanks again!
The long printout is the pruner successively simplifying
the form.
The final part of that is the reduced failing test
case. The fields mean:
:vars Names of variables bound in the lambda forms
:var-types Their types
:vals The values that were to be used as arguments to the
lambda forms.
:decls1
:decls2 The OPTIMIZE decls for the optimized/unoptimized forms.
:form The body of the lambda forms. This is what is printed
by prune-results as it does its work.
:optimized-form
:unoptimized-form The two lambda forms built from those fields.
In gcl, the unoptimized form is not compiled, but instead a form
like (funcall (function ,unoptimized-lambda-form) ,@vals) is constructed
and eval-ed.
The test fails if the compile of optimized-form aborts, if either evaluation
aborts, or if the return results are not the same.
In this case, the compile aborted. I've reduced the form a bit
more and pruned off unnecessary lambda parameters and type declarations:
;;; gcl (found by Camm)
;;; Error in COMPILER::CMP-ANON [or a callee]: The function NIL is undefined.
(deftest misc.286
(funcall
(compile
nil
'(lambda (e)
(declare (optimize (speed 1) (space 3) (safety 3) (debug 3)
(compilation-speed 1)))
(flet ((%f11 (f11-2) 0))
(%f11 (unwind-protect
e
(tagbody
(let* ((v4 (unwind-protect (go 0)))) 0)
0)
(logand (handler-bind () 0)))))))
10)
0)
BTW, once LOOP-RANDOM-INT-FORMS finishes reducing test cases, you can abort
it and get at the test cases in the list $y. The function (f i) will compile
and evaluate the optimized form of (elt $y i) on the apppropriate vals; (g i)
will do the same on the unoptimized form (f, g, and $y are all in the CL-TEST
package.)
Paul
- [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output,
Paul F. Dietz <=
- [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/03
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/05
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gcl-devel] Interpretation of random tester output, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10