|
| From: | Paul F. Dietz |
| Subject: | Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl and the random tester |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:19:40 -0600 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 |
I wrote:
Yes, it is worthwhile. Currently these operators are conditionalized out of the generator, so we can test without them. Without them, gcl doesn't have any compiler bugs that I know about that the random tester can stimulate (although some might exist).
I just had gcl segfault on random tests (size 1000, arg num 8)
after < 900 iterations. Oh well.
Paul
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |