[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so
|
From: |
Richard Henderson |
|
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 16:51:46 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:35:36PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> Wouldn't, e.g., LD_PRELOADing something break this assumption?
Yes. Or, indeed, just recompiling the library could result
in different PLT offsets within the DSO, even on x86.
This behaviour is completely broken. It'll never work reliably.
r~
- [Gcl-devel] function addresses and ld.so, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/12
- [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so, Ian Lance Taylor, 2003/08/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so, Ian Lance Taylor, 2003/08/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: function addresses and ld.so, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/14