Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9

gcl-devel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9

From:	Camm Maguire
Subject:	Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9
Date:	08 Aug 2003 12:21:13 -0400
User-agent:	Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Greetings!

Matthew White <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> > Greetings!
> > 
> > Matthew White <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > In the short term, a tarred copy of that build would be excellent - we
> > > > > have a class starting here very soon that is going to use gcl.....
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > OK, I'm building it now.  Is there a site to which I can ftp it when
> > > > done? 
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately there isn't an site here that you can ftp into....Can we
> > > arrange some other way of grabbing it?
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, try http://people.debian.org/~camm in a little while.  You may
> > have difficulty using this image in compiling and loading files using
> > setjmp, however.
> 
> Thanks for that - and that's why I want to help out as much as I can in
> trying to find a way to get gcl to compile here! :)
> 

Great!


> > > > You know that our ansi build is a work in progress, yes?
> > > 
> > > Yep.
> > > 
> > > > > On the other hand, I would of course like to help persue the error.  I
> > > > > patched the file, recompiled and this is what I got :-
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Compiling PCL_WALK...
> > > > > Compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_walk.lisp.
> > > > > End of Pass 1.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE was replaced by 
> > > > > iteration.
> > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE was replaced by 
> > > > > iteration.
> > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE-HANDLE-REPEAT-1 was
> > > > > replaced by iteration.
> > > > > End of Pass 2.  
> > > > > OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), Space=0, 
> > > > > Speed=3
> > > > > Finished compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_walk.o.
> > > > > Loading binary of PCL_WALK...
> > > > > 
> > > > > Error: Undefined symbol "setjmp"
> > > > > --
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > OK, then please send me
> > > > 
> > > > nm pcl_walk.o |grep setjmp
> > > > nm saved_gcl |grep setjmp
> > > > nm --dynamic /lib/<your libc> |grep setjmp
> > > 
> > > Here we go :-
> > > 
> > > address@hidden pcl]$ nm pcl_walk.o | grep setjmp
> > > [177]     |         0|       0|NOTY |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |setjmp
> > > 
> > > address@hidden pcl]$ nm ../unixport/saved_gcl | grep setjmp
> > > [7569]    |   2324856|       0|FUNC |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |setjmp
> > > [7245]    |   2326056|       0|FUNC |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |sigsetjmp
> > > 
> > > address@hidden pcl]$ nm -D /lib/libc.so.1 | grep setjmp
> > > [1166]    |    207784|      32|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |_setjmp
> > > [884]     |    207892|     172|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |_sigsetjmp
> > > [325]     |    207784|      32|FUNC |WEAK |0    |9      |setjmp
> > > [8]       |    207892|     172|FUNC |WEAK |0    |9      |sigsetjmp
> > > 
> > > address@hidden pcl]$ nm -D /lib/libc.a | grep setjmp
> > > /lib/libc.a[setjmp.o]:
> > > /lib/libc.a[sigsetjmp.o]:
> > > 
> > > I hope this is what you are after.
> > 
> > Yes, thanks.  Please try this patch:
> > 
> > Index: sfasli.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvsroot/gcl/gcl/o/sfasli.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.10
> > diff -u -r1.10 sfasli.c
> > -- sfasli.c 1 Mar 2003 22:37:37 -0000       1.10
> > +++ sfasli.c        7 Aug 2003 16:45:45 -0000
> > @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@
> >        h->u.def.section=q[u]->section;
> >        *c='@';
> >      }
> > -    if (!strncmp(q[u]->name,"__",2) && 
> > !strcmp("i3",q[u]->name+strlen(q[u]->name)-2)) {
> > +    if ((!strncmp(q[u]->name,"__",2) && 
> > !strcmp("i3",q[u]->name+strlen(q[u]->name)-2))
> > +   || !strcmp(q[u]->name,"setjmp")) {
> >        struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h;
> >        if 
> > (!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
> >     FEerror("Cannot make new hash entry",0);
> > 
> > 
> > On the solaris box of the autobuilder, setjmp has is reported with a
> > version suffix, such as setjmp@@sysv....  GCL will define and add such
> > symbols without their suffix.  On most machines this picks up setjmp.
> > Then on arm, certain symbols of the form __...i3 needed to be
> > defined.  So now I've added your case, but clearly we need a better
> > algorithm at this point.  We might be able to loop through all
> > symbols, defining those that are undefined in the base image, but I
> > thought I tried this and failed.  Hmmm.
> 
> OK, I put that patch in and recompiled.  It got a little further, but is
> now complaining about another undefined symbol.......... :-
> 
> --
> Compiling PCL_CACHE...
> Compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_cache.lisp.
> End of Pass 1.
> 
> ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of GET-CACHE-VECTOR was replaced by
> iteration.
> End of Pass 2.
> OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), Space=0, Speed=3
> Finished compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_cache.o.
> Loading binary of PCL_CACHE...
> 
> Error: Undefined symbol ".div"
> Fast links are on: do (si::use-fast-links nil) for debugging
> Error signalled by OR.
> Broken at LOAD.  Type :H for Help.
> >>patch -p0 <pcl_methods.patch
>   Looks like a unified context diff.
> File to patch: ^Cmake[1]: *** [pcl_boot.c] Error 3
> make: *** [unixport/saved_pcl_gcl] Interrupt
> --
> 
> Like before, I've used nm on the relevant object/archive files and got
> :-
> 
> address@hidden gcl-2.5.3]$ nm pcl/pcl_cache.o | grep ".div"
> [234]   |         0|       0|NOTY |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |.div
> [240]   |         0|       0|NOTY |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |Ldivide
> 
> address@hidden gcl-2.5.3]$ nm unixport/saved_gcl | grep ".div"
> [6722]  |   2324840|       0|FUNC |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |.div
> [7758]  |   2325356|       0|FUNC |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |.udiv
> [8910]  |    719880|     220|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |Ldivide
> [8833]  |   1675172|      12|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmp_divide_by_zero
> [7722]  |   2029688|     584|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmpn_dc_divrem_n
> [8100]  |   2078632|     136|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmpn_divexact_by3c
> [7268]  |   2078768|    2672|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__gmpn_divrem_1
> [7270]  |   2081440|     960|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__gmpn_divrem_2
> [6961]  |   2030592|    1112|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmpn_sb_divrem_mn
> [7972]  |   2026784|    2904|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__gmpn_tdiv_qr
> [7609]  |   2077432|     380|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__gmpn_udiv_qrnnd
> [6561]  |   1665632|      32|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmpz_cdiv_q_2exp
> [5453]  |   1665152|     480|FUNC |LOCL |0    |9     
> |__gmpz_cfdiv_q_2exp
> [7772]  |   1665664|      32|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9     
> |__gmpz_fdiv_q_2exp
> [8091]  |   1672552|     536|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__gmpz_tdiv_qr
> [9263]  |   2325920|       0|FUNC |GLOB |0    |UNDEF  |__udiv64
> [5451]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |cfdiv_q_2exp.c
> [5986]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |dc_divrem_n.c
> [6066]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |diveby3.c
> [6068]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |divrem_1.c
> [6070]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |divrem_2.c
> [7487]  |    720700|      36|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |integer_divide1
> [5988]  |   2030272|     320|FUNC |LOCL |0    |9     
> |mpn_dc_div_3_halves_by_2
> [5963]  |   2013832|      60|FUNC |LOCL |0    |9     
> |mpn_fft_div_2exp_modF
> [6675]  |    717600|    1360|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |number_divide
> [7794]  |   2528012|       4|OBJT |GLOB |0    |21    
> |sLdivision_by_zero
> [5989]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |sb_divrem_mn.c
> [5490]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |tdiv_qr.c
> [5984]  |         0|       0|FILE |LOCL |0    |ABS    |tdiv_qr.c
> [947]   |    721240|      28|FUNC |LOCL |0    |9      |zero_divisor
> 
> address@hidden gcl-2.5.3]$ nm -D /lib/libc.so.1 | grep ".div"
> [1937]  |    781864|      52|FUNC |GLOB |0    |20     |.div
> [1918]  |    781916|      32|FUNC |GLOB |0    |20     |.udiv
> [136]   |    126316|    3604|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |_Q_div
> [2065]  |    116688|     840|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__div64
> [687]   |    118304|     800|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |__udiv64
> [1714]  |    203944|     616|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |_ldivide
> [1126]  |    268020|     320|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |_lldiv
> [342]   |    228096|      96|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |div
> [1254]  |    228192|      96|FUNC |GLOB |0    |9      |ldiv
> [671]   |    203944|     616|FUNC |WEAK |0    |9      |ldivide
> [701]   |    268020|     320|FUNC |WEAK |0    |9      |lldiv
> 
> address@hidden gcl-2.5.3]$ nm -D /lib/libc.a | grep ".div"
> /lib/libc.a[hwmuldiv.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[hwmuldiv.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[_Q_div.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[ldivide.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[div.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[lldiv.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[divrem64.o]:
> /lib/libc.a[_div.o]:
> 
> So I'm guessing that this is going to keep happening isn't it?!? :)
> 

Actually, probably not.  There are just a few undefined (by gcl
itself) symbols that gcl will compile into objects.  You likely will
succeed if you add a '|| !strcmp(".div",q[u]->name) ' to the patch I
sent you, or if not will probably only need one or two more,
e.g. ".mul" I'm guessing.  I'd be interested to know if you have time
to try it out.  BTW, you don't need to rebuild the whole thing at each
iteration.  Simply edit sfasli.c, rm o/sfasl.o, cd o, make sfasl.o, cd
../unixport, make saved_gcl, cd .., make.

But the real once-and-for-all solution I'm hoping will be in the
following patch, which I'd also appreciate if you could try:

Index: sfasli.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gcl/gcl/o/sfasli.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 sfasli.c
--- sfasli.c    1 Mar 2003 22:37:37 -0000       1.10
+++ sfasli.c    8 Aug 2003 16:13:18 -0000
@@ -53,30 +53,60 @@
   if ((v=bfd_canonicalize_symtab(bself,q))<0)
     FEerror("Cannot canonicalize self's symtab",0);
   for (u=0;u<v;u++) {
-    char *c;
+    char *c=NULL;
+    struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h;
+
+    if (!*q[u]->name)
+      continue;
+
     if ((c=(char *)strstr(q[u]->name,"@@"))) {
-      struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h;
       *c=0;
       if 
(!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
        FEerror("Cannot make new hash entry",0);
-      h->type=bfd_link_hash_defined;
-      if (!q[u]->section)
-       FEerror("Symbol is missing section",0);
-      h->u.def.value=q[u]->value+q[u]->section->vma;
-      h->u.def.section=q[u]->section;
-      *c='@';
-    }
-    if (!strncmp(q[u]->name,"__",2) && 
!strcmp("i3",q[u]->name+strlen(q[u]->name)-2)) {
-      struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h;
-      if 
(!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
+      h->type=bfd_link_hash_new;
+    } else if 
+      
(!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_FALSE,MY_BFD_FALSE,MY_BFD_TRUE))
 &&
+       
!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
        FEerror("Cannot make new hash entry",0);
+
+    if (h->type!=bfd_link_hash_defined) {
       h->type=bfd_link_hash_defined;
       if (!q[u]->section)
-       FEerror("Symbol is missing section",0);
+       FEerror("Symbol ~S is missing 
section",1,make_simple_string(q[u]->name));
       h->u.def.value=q[u]->value+q[u]->section->vma;
       h->u.def.section=q[u]->section;
     }
+
+    if (c) {
+      *c='@';
+      c=NULL;
+    }
   }
+
+/*     if ((c=(char *)strstr(q[u]->name,"@@"))) { */
+/*       struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h; */
+/*       *c=0; */
+/*       if 
(!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
 */
+/*     FEerror("Cannot make new hash entry",0); */
+/*       h->type=bfd_link_hash_defined; */
+/*       if (!q[u]->section) */
+/*     FEerror("Symbol is missing section",0); */
+/*       h->u.def.value=q[u]->value+q[u]->section->vma; */
+/*       h->u.def.section=q[u]->section; */
+/*       *c='@'; */
+/*     } */
+/*     if ((!strncmp(q[u]->name,"__",2) && 
!strcmp("i3",q[u]->name+strlen(q[u]->name)-2)) */
+/*     || !strcmp(q[u]->name,"setjmp")) { */
+/*       struct bfd_link_hash_entry *h; */
+/*       if 
(!(h=bfd_link_hash_lookup(link_info.hash,q[u]->name,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE,MY_BFD_TRUE)))
 */
+/*     FEerror("Cannot make new hash entry",0); */
+/*       h->type=bfd_link_hash_defined; */
+/*       if (!q[u]->section) */
+/*     FEerror("Symbol is missing section",0); */
+/*       h->u.def.value=q[u]->value+q[u]->section->vma; */
+/*       h->u.def.section=q[u]->section; */
+/*     } */
+/*   } */
 #ifndef HAVE_ALLOCA
   free(q);
 #endif

If this works on arm, I'll probably commit it.  Please let me know.

Take care,


> Thank you for your continued help with this.  Let me know what else I
> can do at this end to help out in finding the solution.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matthew White.
> 
> > Take care,
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Matthew White.
> > > 
> > > > > On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 02:51, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > > > > > Greetings!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > OK, our sparc solaris 'autobuilder' at the University of Texas only
> > > > > > builds the traditional image, as that's all they need.  I just 
> > > > > > tested
> > > > > > the --enable-ansi build successfully on this box, and it works, so I
> > > > > > can't reproduce this myself (yet).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > (daggoo.cs.utexas.edu$ uname -a
> > > > > > SunOS daggoo.cs.utexas.edu 5.8 Generic_108528-11 sun4u sparc 
> > > > > > SUNW,Ultra-5_10
> > > > > > daggoo.cs.utexas.edu$ gcc -v
> > > > > > Reading specs from 
> > > > > > /lusr/gnu/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/3.0.3/specs
> > > > > > Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/lusr/gnu 
> > > > > > --enable-shared --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-threads=posix 
> > > > > > --with-as=/lusr/gnu/bin/as --with-ld=/lusr/gnu/bin/ld
> > > > > > Thread model: posix
> > > > > > gcc version 3.0.3
> > > > > > )
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > If you just need a build, I can tar this up for you.  If you would
> > > > > > like to pursue this error, which of course is helpful for us, try 
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > patch:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Index: sfaslbfd.c
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > RCS file: /cvsroot/gcl/gcl/o/sfaslbfd.c,v
> > > > > > retrieving revision 1.12
> > > > > > diff -u -r1.12 sfaslbfd.c
> > > > > > -- sfaslbfd.c       10 Feb 2003 17:48:04 -0000      1.12
> > > > > > +++ sfaslbfd.c      6 Aug 2003 16:45:07 -0000
> > > > > > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
> > > > > >        continue;
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >      if (h->type!=bfd_link_hash_defined) 
> > > > > > -      FEerror("Undefined symbol",0);
> > > > > > +      FEerror("Undefined symbol 
> > > > > > ~S",1,make_simple_string(q[u]->name));
> > > > > >        
> > > > > >      if (h->u.def.section) {
> > > > > >        q[u]->value=h->u.def.value+h->u.def.section->vma;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Rerun, and get the symbol name which is undefined.  We can try to
> > > > > > proceed from there.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Take care,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Matthew White <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Your problem is just coming from your bfd library in its 
> > > > > > > > attempt to
> > > > > > > > relocate one of the binary .o files on loading.  If I remember, 
> > > > > > > > I ran
> > > > > > > > into this when I setup the solaris autobuilder for the utexas 
> > > > > > > > people.
> > > > > > > > I don't know what bfd comes with solaris generically, so if 
> > > > > > > > memory
> > > > > > > > serves I setup the solaris autobuilder to compile gcl's local 
> > > > > > > > bfd
> > > > > > > > copy.  so I would suggest trying
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > --enable-ansi --disable-statsysbfd --enable-locbfd
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Yep, I gave that a whirl on a completely clean slate.  Things 
> > > > > > > were going
> > > > > > > well, it compiled the local bfd library no problem, and continued
> > > > > > > through the compile but it died again at the exact same spot, 
> > > > > > > with the
> > > > > > > same error as it had been previously.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I checked the 'makedefs' file and watched the compile to make 
> > > > > > > sure that
> > > > > > > when the linking was done for 'saved_gcl' that it was linking 
> > > > > > > against
> > > > > > > the local bfd library, and it seemed that this was the case.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I should point out that I did have to make one small modification 
> > > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > 'makedefs' file. I added the location of 'libncurses.a' to LIBS, 
> > > > > > > as it
> > > > > > > didn't seem to be picking it up during compilation.  I had been 
> > > > > > > using
> > > > > > > the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable previously to get around
> > > > > > > this.....So my LIBS line reads :-
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > LIBS= -lm  /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/binutils/bfd/libbfd.a
> > > > > > > /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/binutils/libiberty/libiberty.a -lsocket -lnsl 
> > > > > > > -lreadline
> > > > > > > /usr/local/lib/libncurses.a
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > If you compile GCL's copy of gmp3 too, I think you might also 
> > > > > > > > need to
> > > > > > > > do the following after the main configure:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > cd gmp3
> > > > > > > > ./configure --build=sparc-sun-solaris2.8
> > > > > > > > cd ..
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I have been using GCL's copy of gmp3, and did use that configure 
> > > > > > > option
> > > > > > > this time round......
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks for your help so far - I'm not fully sure what else I can 
> > > > > > > attach
> > > > > > > that would assist, but let me know what extra information would 
> > > > > > > help.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Matthew White.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Matthew White <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I've been trying to compile GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9 for a few 
> > > > > > > > > days now,
> > > > > > > > > and keep hitting the same problem.  The problem is occuring 
> > > > > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > compiling PCL, and in particular when compiling with the 
> > > > > > > > > 'pcl_walk.lisp'
> > > > > > > > > file.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Below is my build output from that section of the build:-
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > (cd pcl; rm -f *.c; make all)
> > > > > > > > > make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/gcl-2.5.3/pcl'
> > > > > > > > > rm -f *.o *gazonk*
> > > > > > > > > cp ../h/cmpinclude.h .
> > > > > > > > > echo '(load "sys-package.lisp")' '(setq *features* (delete 
> > > > > > > > > (quote kcl)
> > > > > > > > > *features*))' '(load "defsys.lisp")(push (quote kcl) 
> > > > > > > > > *features*)' '(setq
> > > > > > > > > pcl::*default-pathname-extensions* (cons "lisp" "o"))' '(setq
> > > > > > > > > pcl::*pathname-extensions* (cons "lisp" "o"))' '(load
> > > > > > > > > "sys-proclaim.lisp")' '(setq compiler::*default-h-file* t)' 
> > > > > > > > > '(setq
> > > > > > > > > compiler::*default-c-file* t)' '(setq 
> > > > > > > > > compiler::*default-data-file* t)'
> > > > > > > > > '(setq compiler::*default-system-p* t)' '(setq 
> > > > > > > > > compiler::*keep-gaz* t)' 
> > > > > > > > > '(pcl::compile-pcl)' | ../unixport/saved_gcl ../unixport/
> > > > > > > > > GCL (GNU Common Lisp)  (2.5.3) Tue Aug  5 10:49:14 EST 2003
> > > > > > > > > Licensed under GNU Library General Public License
> > > > > > > > > Dedicated to the memory of W. Schelter
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Use (help) to get some basic information on how to use GCL.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Loading sys-package.lisp
> > > > > > > > > Finished loading sys-package.lisp
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (:COMPILER :NUMLIB :SDEBUG :DEFPACKAGE TRUNCATE_USE_C BSD 
> > > > > > > > > SPARC SUN SGC
> > > > > > > > >     IEEE-FLOATING-POINT UNIX GMP GCL AKCL COMMON)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Loading defsys.lisp
> > > > > > > > > Finished loading defsys.lisp
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > (KCL :COMPILER :NUMLIB :SDEBUG :DEFPACKAGE TRUNCATE_USE_C BSD 
> > > > > > > > > SPARC SUN
> > > > > > > > >      SGC IEEE-FLOATING-POINT UNIX GMP GCL AKCL COMMON)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ("lisp" . "o")
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Loading sys-proclaim.lisp
> > > > > > > > > Finished loading sys-proclaim.lisp
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > T
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Compiling PCL_PKG...
> > > > > > > > > Compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_pkg.lisp.
> > > > > > > > > ; (EXPORT (INTERN # ...) ...) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (EXPORT (INTERN
> > > > > > > > >                                            (SYMBOL-NAME 
> > > > > > > > > :ITERATE)
> > > > > > > > >                                            (FIND-PACKAGE 
> > > > > > > > > :ITERATE))
> > > > > > > > >                                           (FIND-PACKAGE 
> > > > > > > > > :ITERATE)) was
> > > > > > > > > in a bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IN-PACKAGE :WALKER) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IN-PACKAGE :WALKER) was in 
> > > > > > > > > a bad
> > > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (EXPORT '(DEFINE-WALKER-TEMPLATE WALK-FORM ...)) is being 
> > > > > > > > > compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (EXPORT 
> > > > > > > > > '(DEFINE-WALKER-TEMPLATE
> > > > > > > > >                                             WALK-FORM
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > WALK-FORM-EXPAND-MACROS-P
> > > > > > > > >                                             NESTED-WALK-FORM
> > > > > > > > >                                             VARIABLE-LEXICAL-P
> > > > > > > > >                                             VARIABLE-SPECIAL-P
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > VARIABLE-GLOBALLY-SPECIAL-P
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > *VARIABLE-DECLARATIONS*
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > VARIABLE-DECLARATION
> > > > > > > > >                                             MACROEXPAND-ALL)) 
> > > > > > > > > was in a
> > > > > > > > > bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IN-PACKAGE :ITERATE) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IN-PACKAGE :ITERATE) was 
> > > > > > > > > in a bad
> > > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (EXPORT '(ITERATE ITERATE* ...)) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (EXPORT '(ITERATE ITERATE* 
> > > > > > > > > GATHERING
> > > > > > > > >                                             GATHER 
> > > > > > > > > WITH-GATHERING
> > > > > > > > >                                             INTERVAL ELEMENTS
> > > > > > > > >                                             LIST-ELEMENTS 
> > > > > > > > > LIST-TAILS
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > >                                             PLIST-ELEMENTS 
> > > > > > > > > EACHTIME
> > > > > > > > >                                             WHILE UNTIL 
> > > > > > > > > COLLECTING
> > > > > > > > >                                             JOINING MAXIMIZING
> > > > > > > > >                                             MINIMIZING SUMMING
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > *ITERATE-WARNINGS*)) was in
> > > > > > > > > a bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IN-PACKAGE :PCL) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IN-PACKAGE :PCL) was in a 
> > > > > > > > > bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IMPORT '(STRUCTUREP STRUCTURE-DEF ...)) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IMPORT '(STRUCTUREP 
> > > > > > > > > STRUCTURE-DEF
> > > > > > > > >                                             STRUCTURE-REF)) 
> > > > > > > > > was in a bad
> > > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (SHADOW 'LISP:DOTIMES) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (SHADOW 'LISP:DOTIMES) was 
> > > > > > > > > in a bad
> > > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IN-PACKAGE "SI") is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IN-PACKAGE "SI") was in a 
> > > > > > > > > bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (EXPORT '(%STRUCTURE-NAME %COMPILED-FUNCTION-NAME ...)) is 
> > > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (EXPORT '(%STRUCTURE-NAME
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > %COMPILED-FUNCTION-NAME
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > %SET-COMPILED-FUNCTION-NAME
> > > > > > > > >                                             %INSTANCE-REF
> > > > > > > > >                                             
> > > > > > > > > %SET-INSTANCE-REF)) was in a
> > > > > > > > > bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (IN-PACKAGE 'PCL) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (IN-PACKAGE 'PCL) was in a 
> > > > > > > > > bad place.
> > > > > > > > > ; (SHADOW 'DOCUMENTATION) is being compiled.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Warning: The package operation (SHADOW 'DOCUMENTATION) was 
> > > > > > > > > in a bad
> > > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > > > > End of Pass 1.  
> > > > > > > > > End of Pass 2.  
> > > > > > > > > OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), 
> > > > > > > > > Space=0, Speed=3
> > > > > > > > > Finished compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_pkg.o.
> > > > > > > > > Loading binary of PCL_PKG...
> > > > > > > > > Compiling PCL_WALK...
> > > > > > > > > Compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_walk.lisp.
> > > > > > > > > End of Pass 1.  
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE was replaced by 
> > > > > > > > > iteration.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE was replaced by 
> > > > > > > > > iteration.
> > > > > > > > > ;; Note: Tail-recursive call of WALK-TEMPLATE-HANDLE-REPEAT-1 
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > replaced by iteration.
> > > > > > > > > End of Pass 2.  
> > > > > > > > > OPTIMIZE levels: Safety=1 (No runtime error checking), 
> > > > > > > > > Space=0, Speed=3
> > > > > > > > > Finished compiling /tmp/gcl-2.5.3/unixport/../pcl/pcl_walk.o.
> > > > > > > > > Loading binary of PCL_WALK...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Error: Undefined symbol
> > > > > > > > > Error signalled by OR.
> > > > > > > > > Broken at SYSTEM::BREAK-LEVEL.  Type :H for Help.
> > > > > > > > > >>patch -p0 <pcl_methods.patch
> > > > > > > > >   Looks like a unified context diff.
> > > > > > > > > File to patch: ^Cmake[1]: *** [pcl_boot.c] Error 3
> > > > > > > > > make: *** [unixport/saved_pcl_gcl] Interrupt
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > The only "configure" option that I used was --enable-ansi, 
> > > > > > > > > but it seems
> > > > > > > > > to be occuring with or without it.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > The gcc version that I'm using is :-
> > > > > > > > >       gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > I was just wondering whether anyone else had come across the 
> > > > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > problem, or had any ideas of what I could look into to try 
> > > > > > > > > and solve it
> > > > > > > > > - any pointers would be appreciated!!
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Matthew White.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Gcl-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > > > > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Gcl-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > > > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread]
[Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/05
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/05
  - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/06
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/06
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/06
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/06
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/06
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/07
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/07
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire <=
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Matthew White, 2003/08/11
    - Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9, Camm Maguire, 2003/08/11
Prev by Date: Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9
Next by Date: [Gcl-devel] shared library version dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9
Next by thread: Re: [Gcl-devel] Problems Compiling GCL 2.5.3 on Solaris 9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread