[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification |
Date: |
09 Jul 2003 22:43:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings, and thanks! OK, would someone mind putting together a
brief 'Paul Dietz style' test.lisp which would exersize this extension
only and ensure that whatever code we finally commit satisfies
everyone's needs? Only if interested parties have available time, of
course.
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Hi Matt! OK, Take four. I can't imagine it would be a problem to
> > skip over whitespace in the case of our extension (package designator
> > before a left paren), so that's what I've included below. As for
> > skipping in the case of whitespace between a package designator and a
> > symbol, I'll refer this to Paul for comment.
>
> Skipping whitespace after the : (or ::) should also be an allowable
> syntax extension, as I read chapter 2.
>
> Do you plan to implement FOO:(A B C) as well as FOO::(A B C)?
> In ACL the two appear to be equivalent, even if A (or B, or C)
> is not external in package FOO.
>
It doesn't seem logical that the two should be equivalent, but I'm
open to implementing what people find useful as long as it does not
break the spec.
Take care,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/02
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Paul F. Dietz, 2003/07/02
- Message not available
- [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/08
- [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Matt Kaufmann, 2003/07/08
- [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/08
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Matt Kaufmann, 2003/07/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/09
- [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Paul F. Dietz, 2003/07/09
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification,
Camm Maguire <=
- [Gcl-devel] defgeneric method fix, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/11
- Segfault in change-class (was Re: [Gcl-devel] defgeneric method fix), Paul F. Dietz, 2003/07/12
- Re: Segfault in change-class (was Re: [Gcl-devel] defgeneric method fix), Paul F. Dietz, 2003/07/12
- [Gcl-devel] [ Task #1924] IN-PACKAGE form put out of order in compiled file, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/14
- Re: Segfault in change-class (was Re: [Gcl-devel] defgeneric method fix), Camm Maguire, 2003/07/15
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Matt Kaufmann, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Matt Kaufmann, 2003/07/10
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: possible lisp reader enhancement/modification, Camm Maguire, 2003/07/10