Re: [Gcl-devel] On the package tests

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> 
> > Greetings!  OK I've just committed some changes.  I'm now down to 172
> > out of 4148 failures.
> 
> I'm at 203 fails out of 4246.  I fixed SIMPLE-BASE-STRING.8, which was wrong.
> I've added various additional tests, some of which are failing.
> For example, there are five tests of FLET in error situations
> that should be causing PROGRAM-ERRORs.
> 

OK, will check this out.

> 
>  > Also, I
> > can't find where the function package-error is defined in the spec
> > either.
> 
> Use the symbol index of the hyperspec.  PACKAGE-ERROR is defined in
> section 9, 'Conditions'.
> 

I saw that, but I don't understand how it can be used as a function.
Specifically the instances of (package-error nil 'package-error).

> 
> > I'm hoping that the field is small enough
> > now that you might be able to shed some additional light as to how the
> > remaining failures should work.  
> 
> I'll look at the remaining package test failures this evening (CDT)..
> 

Thanks!

Take care,

>       Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah