Re: [Gcl-devel] Current state of the ansi test suite

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!

OK, I'll defer to your judgement here.  What about supplying functions
that aren't in the spec -- i.e. implementation-dependent functions?
Is this generically OK as long as I don't tread on the canonical
namespace?  Which leads me to another question -- there is no truly
'static' function declaration in lisp, is there?  I.e. if one does not
export a function from a package, one can still always access it with
package::function, right?  Is there any way to make an internal
function  visible only to a certain defined group of other functions,
no matter how it is called, i.e. like a static declaration in a C
'file'?  

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings!  Great, OK, so from my reading, I can add a keyword :rev to
> > member, set-difference, and nset-difference.  Any disagree?
> 
> I'm afraid I have to disagree. On closer reading, the standard
> says that safe calls must signal a program-error if you do that.
> 
> (See section 3.5.1.4.)
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah