Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: destructuring-bind

[Vadim V. Zhytnikov]

I confirm. I've got right result for CLHS example with
CLISP and CMUCL. But result with GCL from CVS
is wrong. I guess we've met another GCL ANSI
incompatibility.

Vadim

Camm Maguire wrote:

> Greetings!
>
> Will someone please try the example for destructuring-bind as listed
> in the ansi hyper-spec?  The code I've put in, stolen from Maxima
> stolen from cmulisp, doesn't seem to give the intended answer.
>
> Take care,
>
> C Y <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > >From Maxima list:
> >
> > > And, actually, if a missing destructuring-bind is really the problem,
> > > I think we should just add a version for maxima and gcl, and wait
> > > until
> > > gcl gets it's own version.  (Should be able to steal one from CMUCL.)
> >
> > Maybe something to add to the TODO list?
> >
> > CY
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
> > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
> ==========================================================================
> "The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel

--

[ Vadim V. Zhytnikov  <address@hidden>  <address@hidden> ]