gawk-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gawk-diffs] [SCM] gawk branch, gawk-4.2-stable, updated. gawk-4.1.0-305


From: Arnold Robbins
Subject: [gawk-diffs] [SCM] gawk branch, gawk-4.2-stable, updated. gawk-4.1.0-3058-g03cca4d
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:40:44 -0400 (EDT)

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gawk".

The branch, gawk-4.2-stable has been updated
       via  03cca4ddb49355fffb487b2b1dee3fc5859027f7 (commit)
      from  92014ca462f99220d2238692764f230448e4dae9 (commit)

Those revisions listed above that are new to this repository have
not appeared on any other notification email; so we list those
revisions in full, below.

- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gawk.git/commit/?id=03cca4ddb49355fffb487b2b1dee3fc5859027f7

commit 03cca4ddb49355fffb487b2b1dee3fc5859027f7
Author: Arnold D. Robbins <address@hidden>
Date:   Wed Oct 3 05:40:31 2018 +0300

    Remove unneeded files.

diff --git a/missing_d/ChangeLog b/missing_d/ChangeLog
index 6752ddc..bc54838 100644
--- a/missing_d/ChangeLog
+++ b/missing_d/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-10-03         Arnold D. Robbins     <address@hidden>
+
+       * intprops.h, verify.h: Removed. The copy in ../support is
+       good enough. Thanks to Bruno Haible for the tip.
+
 2018-09-21         Arnold D. Robbins     <address@hidden>
 
        * intprops.h, mktime.c, verify.h: Updated from GNULIB.
diff --git a/missing_d/intprops.h b/missing_d/intprops.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 9702aec..0000000
--- a/missing_d/intprops.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,455 +0,0 @@
-/* intprops.h -- properties of integer types
-
-   Copyright (C) 2001-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
-   This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
-   under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published
-   by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or
-   (at your option) any later version.
-
-   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
-   GNU Lesser General Public License for more details.
-
-   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
-   along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
-
-/* Written by Paul Eggert.  */
-
-#ifndef _GL_INTPROPS_H
-#define _GL_INTPROPS_H
-
-#include <limits.h>
-
-/* Return a value with the common real type of E and V and the value of V.
-   Do not evaluate E.  */
-#define _GL_INT_CONVERT(e, v) ((1 ? 0 : (e)) + (v))
-
-/* Act like _GL_INT_CONVERT (E, -V) but work around a bug in IRIX 6.5 cc; see
-   <https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2011-05/msg00406.html>.  */
-#define _GL_INT_NEGATE_CONVERT(e, v) ((1 ? 0 : (e)) - (v))
-
-/* The extra casts in the following macros work around compiler bugs,
-   e.g., in Cray C 5.0.3.0.  */
-
-/* True if the arithmetic type T is an integer type.  bool counts as
-   an integer.  */
-#define TYPE_IS_INTEGER(t) ((t) 1.5 == 1)
-
-/* True if the real type T is signed.  */
-#define TYPE_SIGNED(t) (! ((t) 0 < (t) -1))
-
-/* Return 1 if the real expression E, after promotion, has a
-   signed or floating type.  Do not evaluate E.  */
-#define EXPR_SIGNED(e) (_GL_INT_NEGATE_CONVERT (e, 1) < 0)
-
-
-/* Minimum and maximum values for integer types and expressions.  */
-
-/* The width in bits of the integer type or expression T.
-   Do not evaluate T.
-   Padding bits are not supported; this is checked at compile-time below.  */
-#define TYPE_WIDTH(t) (sizeof (t) * CHAR_BIT)
-
-/* The maximum and minimum values for the integer type T.  */
-#define TYPE_MINIMUM(t) ((t) ~ TYPE_MAXIMUM (t))
-#define TYPE_MAXIMUM(t)                                                 \
-  ((t) (! TYPE_SIGNED (t)                                               \
-        ? (t) -1                                                        \
-        : ((((t) 1 << (TYPE_WIDTH (t) - 2)) - 1) * 2 + 1)))
-
-/* The maximum and minimum values for the type of the expression E,
-   after integer promotion.  E is not evaluated.  */
-#define _GL_INT_MINIMUM(e)                                              \
-  (EXPR_SIGNED (e)                                                      \
-   ? ~ _GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM (e)                                       \
-   : _GL_INT_CONVERT (e, 0))
-#define _GL_INT_MAXIMUM(e)                                              \
-  (EXPR_SIGNED (e)                                                      \
-   ? _GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM (e)                                         \
-   : _GL_INT_NEGATE_CONVERT (e, 1))
-#define _GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM(e)                                       \
-  (((_GL_INT_CONVERT (e, 1) << (TYPE_WIDTH ((e) + 0) - 2)) - 1) * 2 + 1)
-
-/* Work around OpenVMS incompatibility with C99.  */
-#if !defined LLONG_MAX && defined __INT64_MAX
-# define LLONG_MAX __INT64_MAX
-# define LLONG_MIN __INT64_MIN
-#endif
-
-/* This include file assumes that signed types are two's complement without
-   padding bits; the above macros have undefined behavior otherwise.
-   If this is a problem for you, please let us know how to fix it for your 
host.
-   This assumption is tested by the intprops-tests module.  */
-
-/* Does the __typeof__ keyword work?  This could be done by
-   'configure', but for now it's easier to do it by hand.  */
-#if (2 <= __GNUC__ \
-     || (1210 <= __IBMC__ && defined __IBM__TYPEOF__) \
-     || (0x5110 <= __SUNPRO_C && !__STDC__))
-# define _GL_HAVE___TYPEOF__ 1
-#else
-# define _GL_HAVE___TYPEOF__ 0
-#endif
-
-/* Return 1 if the integer type or expression T might be signed.  Return 0
-   if it is definitely unsigned.  This macro does not evaluate its argument,
-   and expands to an integer constant expression.  */
-#if _GL_HAVE___TYPEOF__
-# define _GL_SIGNED_TYPE_OR_EXPR(t) TYPE_SIGNED (__typeof__ (t))
-#else
-# define _GL_SIGNED_TYPE_OR_EXPR(t) 1
-#endif
-
-/* Bound on length of the string representing an unsigned integer
-   value representable in B bits.  log10 (2.0) < 146/485.  The
-   smallest value of B where this bound is not tight is 2621.  */
-#define INT_BITS_STRLEN_BOUND(b) (((b) * 146 + 484) / 485)
-
-/* Bound on length of the string representing an integer type or expression T.
-   Subtract 1 for the sign bit if T is signed, and then add 1 more for
-   a minus sign if needed.
-
-   Because _GL_SIGNED_TYPE_OR_EXPR sometimes returns 0 when its argument is
-   signed, this macro may overestimate the true bound by one byte when
-   applied to unsigned types of size 2, 4, 16, ... bytes.  */
-#define INT_STRLEN_BOUND(t)                                     \
-  (INT_BITS_STRLEN_BOUND (TYPE_WIDTH (t) - _GL_SIGNED_TYPE_OR_EXPR (t)) \
-   + _GL_SIGNED_TYPE_OR_EXPR (t))
-
-/* Bound on buffer size needed to represent an integer type or expression T,
-   including the terminating null.  */
-#define INT_BUFSIZE_BOUND(t) (INT_STRLEN_BOUND (t) + 1)
-
-
-/* Range overflow checks.
-
-   The INT_<op>_RANGE_OVERFLOW macros return 1 if the corresponding C
-   operators might not yield numerically correct answers due to
-   arithmetic overflow.  They do not rely on undefined or
-   implementation-defined behavior.  Their implementations are simple
-   and straightforward, but they are a bit harder to use than the
-   INT_<op>_OVERFLOW macros described below.
-
-   Example usage:
-
-     long int i = ...;
-     long int j = ...;
-     if (INT_MULTIPLY_RANGE_OVERFLOW (i, j, LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX))
-       printf ("multiply would overflow");
-     else
-       printf ("product is %ld", i * j);
-
-   Restrictions on *_RANGE_OVERFLOW macros:
-
-   These macros do not check for all possible numerical problems or
-   undefined or unspecified behavior: they do not check for division
-   by zero, for bad shift counts, or for shifting negative numbers.
-
-   These macros may evaluate their arguments zero or multiple times,
-   so the arguments should not have side effects.  The arithmetic
-   arguments (including the MIN and MAX arguments) must be of the same
-   integer type after the usual arithmetic conversions, and the type
-   must have minimum value MIN and maximum MAX.  Unsigned types should
-   use a zero MIN of the proper type.
-
-   These macros are tuned for constant MIN and MAX.  For commutative
-   operations such as A + B, they are also tuned for constant B.  */
-
-/* Return 1 if A + B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  */
-#define INT_ADD_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)          \
-  ((b) < 0                                              \
-   ? (a) < (min) - (b)                                  \
-   : (max) - (b) < (a))
-
-/* Return 1 if A - B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  */
-#define INT_SUBTRACT_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)     \
-  ((b) < 0                                              \
-   ? (max) + (b) < (a)                                  \
-   : (a) < (min) + (b))
-
-/* Return 1 if - A would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  */
-#define INT_NEGATE_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, min, max)          \
-  ((min) < 0                                            \
-   ? (a) < - (max)                                      \
-   : 0 < (a))
-
-/* Return 1 if A * B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  Avoid && and || as they tickle
-   bugs in Sun C 5.11 2010/08/13 and other compilers; see
-   <https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2011-05/msg00401.html>.  */
-#define INT_MULTIPLY_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)     \
-  ((b) < 0                                              \
-   ? ((a) < 0                                           \
-      ? (a) < (max) / (b)                               \
-      : (b) == -1                                       \
-      ? 0                                               \
-      : (min) / (b) < (a))                              \
-   : (b) == 0                                           \
-   ? 0                                                  \
-   : ((a) < 0                                           \
-      ? (a) < (min) / (b)                               \
-      : (max) / (b) < (a)))
-
-/* Return 1 if A / B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  Do not check for division by zero.  */
-#define INT_DIVIDE_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)       \
-  ((min) < 0 && (b) == -1 && (a) < - (max))
-
-/* Return 1 if A % B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  Do not check for division by zero.
-   Mathematically, % should never overflow, but on x86-like hosts
-   INT_MIN % -1 traps, and the C standard permits this, so treat this
-   as an overflow too.  */
-#define INT_REMAINDER_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)    \
-  INT_DIVIDE_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, b, min, max)
-
-/* Return 1 if A << B would overflow in [MIN,MAX] arithmetic.
-   See above for restrictions.  Here, MIN and MAX are for A only, and B need
-   not be of the same type as the other arguments.  The C standard says that
-   behavior is undefined for shifts unless 0 <= B < wordwidth, and that when
-   A is negative then A << B has undefined behavior and A >> B has
-   implementation-defined behavior, but do not check these other
-   restrictions.  */
-#define INT_LEFT_SHIFT_RANGE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)   \
-  ((a) < 0                                              \
-   ? (a) < (min) >> (b)                                 \
-   : (max) >> (b) < (a))
-
-/* True if __builtin_add_overflow (A, B, P) works when P is non-null.  */
-#if 5 <= __GNUC__ && !defined __ICC
-# define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 1
-#else
-# define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW 0
-#endif
-
-/* True if __builtin_add_overflow_p (A, B, C) works.  */
-#define _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P (7 <= __GNUC__)
-
-/* The _GL*_OVERFLOW macros have the same restrictions as the
-   *_RANGE_OVERFLOW macros, except that they do not assume that operands
-   (e.g., A and B) have the same type as MIN and MAX.  Instead, they assume
-   that the result (e.g., A + B) has that type.  */
-#if _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P
-# define _GL_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                               \
-   __builtin_add_overflow_p (a, b, (__typeof__ ((a) + (b))) 0)
-# define _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                          \
-   __builtin_sub_overflow_p (a, b, (__typeof__ ((a) - (b))) 0)
-# define _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                          \
-   __builtin_mul_overflow_p (a, b, (__typeof__ ((a) * (b))) 0)
-#else
-# define _GL_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                                \
-   ((min) < 0 ? INT_ADD_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, b, min, max)                  \
-    : (a) < 0 ? (b) <= (a) + (b)                                         \
-    : (b) < 0 ? (a) <= (a) + (b)                                         \
-    : (a) + (b) < (b))
-# define _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                           \
-   ((min) < 0 ? INT_SUBTRACT_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, b, min, max)             \
-    : (a) < 0 ? 1                                                        \
-    : (b) < 0 ? (a) - (b) <= (a)                                         \
-    : (a) < (b))
-# define _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                           \
-   (((min) == 0 && (((a) < 0 && 0 < (b)) || ((b) < 0 && 0 < (a))))       \
-    || INT_MULTIPLY_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, b, min, max))
-#endif
-#define _GL_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                             \
-  ((min) < 0 ? (b) == _GL_INT_NEGATE_CONVERT (min, 1) && (a) < - (max)  \
-   : (a) < 0 ? (b) <= (a) + (b) - 1                                     \
-   : (b) < 0 && (a) + (b) <= (a))
-#define _GL_REMAINDER_OVERFLOW(a, b, min, max)                          \
-  ((min) < 0 ? (b) == _GL_INT_NEGATE_CONVERT (min, 1) && (a) < - (max)  \
-   : (a) < 0 ? (a) % (b) != ((max) - (b) + 1) % (b)                     \
-   : (b) < 0 && ! _GL_UNSIGNED_NEG_MULTIPLE (a, b, max))
-
-/* Return a nonzero value if A is a mathematical multiple of B, where
-   A is unsigned, B is negative, and MAX is the maximum value of A's
-   type.  A's type must be the same as (A % B)'s type.  Normally (A %
-   -B == 0) suffices, but things get tricky if -B would overflow.  */
-#define _GL_UNSIGNED_NEG_MULTIPLE(a, b, max)                            \
-  (((b) < -_GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM (b)                                   \
-    ? (_GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM (b) == (max)                              \
-       ? (a)                                                            \
-       : (a) % (_GL_INT_CONVERT (a, _GL_SIGNED_INT_MAXIMUM (b)) + 1))   \
-    : (a) % - (b))                                                      \
-   == 0)
-
-/* Check for integer overflow, and report low order bits of answer.
-
-   The INT_<op>_OVERFLOW macros return 1 if the corresponding C operators
-   might not yield numerically correct answers due to arithmetic overflow.
-   The INT_<op>_WRAPV macros also store the low-order bits of the answer.
-   These macros work correctly on all known practical hosts, and do not rely
-   on undefined behavior due to signed arithmetic overflow.
-
-   Example usage, assuming A and B are long int:
-
-     if (INT_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW (a, b))
-       printf ("result would overflow\n");
-     else
-       printf ("result is %ld (no overflow)\n", a * b);
-
-   Example usage with WRAPV flavor:
-
-     long int result;
-     bool overflow = INT_MULTIPLY_WRAPV (a, b, &result);
-     printf ("result is %ld (%s)\n", result,
-             overflow ? "after overflow" : "no overflow");
-
-   Restrictions on these macros:
-
-   These macros do not check for all possible numerical problems or
-   undefined or unspecified behavior: they do not check for division
-   by zero, for bad shift counts, or for shifting negative numbers.
-
-   These macros may evaluate their arguments zero or multiple times, so the
-   arguments should not have side effects.
-
-   The WRAPV macros are not constant expressions.  They support only
-   +, binary -, and *.  The result type must be signed.
-
-   These macros are tuned for their last argument being a constant.
-
-   Return 1 if the integer expressions A * B, A - B, -A, A * B, A / B,
-   A % B, and A << B would overflow, respectively.  */
-
-#define INT_ADD_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW (a, b, _GL_ADD_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW (a, b, _GL_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW)
-#if _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW_P
-# define INT_NEGATE_OVERFLOW(a) INT_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW (0, a)
-#else
-# define INT_NEGATE_OVERFLOW(a) \
-   INT_NEGATE_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, _GL_INT_MINIMUM (a), _GL_INT_MAXIMUM (a))
-#endif
-#define INT_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW (a, b, _GL_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW (a, b, _GL_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_REMAINDER_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW (a, b, _GL_REMAINDER_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_LEFT_SHIFT_OVERFLOW(a, b) \
-  INT_LEFT_SHIFT_RANGE_OVERFLOW (a, b, \
-                                 _GL_INT_MINIMUM (a), _GL_INT_MAXIMUM (a))
-
-/* Return 1 if the expression A <op> B would overflow,
-   where OP_RESULT_OVERFLOW (A, B, MIN, MAX) does the actual test,
-   assuming MIN and MAX are the minimum and maximum for the result type.
-   Arguments should be free of side effects.  */
-#define _GL_BINARY_OP_OVERFLOW(a, b, op_result_overflow)        \
-  op_result_overflow (a, b,                                     \
-                      _GL_INT_MINIMUM (_GL_INT_CONVERT (a, b)), \
-                      _GL_INT_MAXIMUM (_GL_INT_CONVERT (a, b)))
-
-/* Store the low-order bits of A + B, A - B, A * B, respectively, into *R.
-   Return 1 if the result overflows.  See above for restrictions.  */
-#define INT_ADD_WRAPV(a, b, r) \
-  _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV (a, b, r, +, __builtin_add_overflow, INT_ADD_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_SUBTRACT_WRAPV(a, b, r) \
-  _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV (a, b, r, -, __builtin_sub_overflow, INT_SUBTRACT_OVERFLOW)
-#define INT_MULTIPLY_WRAPV(a, b, r) \
-  _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV (a, b, r, *, __builtin_mul_overflow, INT_MULTIPLY_OVERFLOW)
-
-/* Nonzero if this compiler has GCC bug 68193 or Clang bug 25390.  See:
-   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193
-   https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25390
-   For now, assume all versions of GCC-like compilers generate bogus
-   warnings for _Generic.  This matters only for older compilers that
-   lack __builtin_add_overflow.  */
-#if __GNUC__
-# define _GL__GENERIC_BOGUS 1
-#else
-# define _GL__GENERIC_BOGUS 0
-#endif
-
-/* Store the low-order bits of A <op> B into *R, where OP specifies
-   the operation.  BUILTIN is the builtin operation, and OVERFLOW the
-   overflow predicate.  Return 1 if the result overflows.  See above
-   for restrictions.  */
-#if _GL_HAS_BUILTIN_OVERFLOW
-# define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV(a, b, r, op, builtin, overflow) builtin (a, b, r)
-#elif 201112 <= __STDC_VERSION__ && !_GL__GENERIC_BOGUS
-# define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV(a, b, r, op, builtin, overflow) \
-   (_Generic \
-    (*(r), \
-     signed char: \
-       _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                        signed char, SCHAR_MIN, SCHAR_MAX), \
-     short int: \
-       _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                        short int, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX), \
-     int: \
-       _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                        int, INT_MIN, INT_MAX), \
-     long int: \
-       _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned long int, \
-                        long int, LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX), \
-     long long int: \
-       _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned long long int, \
-                        long long int, LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX)))
-#else
-# define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV(a, b, r, op, builtin, overflow) \
-   (sizeof *(r) == sizeof (signed char) \
-    ? _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                       signed char, SCHAR_MIN, SCHAR_MAX) \
-    : sizeof *(r) == sizeof (short int) \
-    ? _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                       short int, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX) \
-    : sizeof *(r) == sizeof (int) \
-    ? _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned int, \
-                       int, INT_MIN, INT_MAX) \
-    : _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_LONGISH(a, b, r, op, overflow))
-# ifdef LLONG_MAX
-#  define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_LONGISH(a, b, r, op, overflow) \
-    (sizeof *(r) == sizeof (long int) \
-     ? _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned long int, \
-                        long int, LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX) \
-     : _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned long long int, \
-                        long long int, LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX))
-# else
-#  define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_LONGISH(a, b, r, op, overflow) \
-    _GL_INT_OP_CALC (a, b, r, op, overflow, unsigned long int, \
-                     long int, LONG_MIN, LONG_MAX)
-# endif
-#endif
-
-/* Store the low-order bits of A <op> B into *R, where the operation
-   is given by OP.  Use the unsigned type UT for calculation to avoid
-   overflow problems.  *R's type is T, with extrema TMIN and TMAX.
-   T must be a signed integer type.  Return 1 if the result overflows.  */
-#define _GL_INT_OP_CALC(a, b, r, op, overflow, ut, t, tmin, tmax) \
-  (sizeof ((a) op (b)) < sizeof (t) \
-   ? _GL_INT_OP_CALC1 ((t) (a), (t) (b), r, op, overflow, ut, t, tmin, tmax) \
-   : _GL_INT_OP_CALC1 (a, b, r, op, overflow, ut, t, tmin, tmax))
-#define _GL_INT_OP_CALC1(a, b, r, op, overflow, ut, t, tmin, tmax) \
-  ((overflow (a, b) \
-    || (EXPR_SIGNED ((a) op (b)) && ((a) op (b)) < (tmin)) \
-    || (tmax) < ((a) op (b))) \
-   ? (*(r) = _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_VIA_UNSIGNED (a, b, op, ut, t), 1) \
-   : (*(r) = _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_VIA_UNSIGNED (a, b, op, ut, t), 0))
-
-/* Return the low-order bits of A <op> B, where the operation is given
-   by OP.  Use the unsigned type UT for calculation to avoid undefined
-   behavior on signed integer overflow, and convert the result to type T.
-   UT is at least as wide as T and is no narrower than unsigned int,
-   T is two's complement, and there is no padding or trap representations.
-   Assume that converting UT to T yields the low-order bits, as is
-   done in all known two's-complement C compilers.  E.g., see:
-   https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Integers-implementation.html
-
-   According to the C standard, converting UT to T yields an
-   implementation-defined result or signal for values outside T's
-   range.  However, code that works around this theoretical problem
-   runs afoul of a compiler bug in Oracle Studio 12.3 x86.  See:
-   https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2017-04/msg00049.html
-   As the compiler bug is real, don't try to work around the
-   theoretical problem.  */
-
-#define _GL_INT_OP_WRAPV_VIA_UNSIGNED(a, b, op, ut, t) \
-  ((t) ((ut) (a) op (ut) (b)))
-
-#endif /* _GL_INTPROPS_H */
diff --git a/missing_d/verify.h b/missing_d/verify.h
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b57dde..0000000
--- a/missing_d/verify.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,285 +0,0 @@
-/* Compile-time assert-like macros.
-
-   Copyright (C) 2005-2006, 2009-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-
-   This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
-   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
-   (at your option) any later version.
-
-   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
-   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
-   GNU General Public License for more details.
-
-   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-   along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
-
-/* Written by Paul Eggert, Bruno Haible, and Jim Meyering.  */
-
-#ifndef _GL_VERIFY_H
-#define _GL_VERIFY_H
-
-
-/* Define _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT to 1 if _Static_assert works as per C11.
-   This is supported by GCC 4.6.0 and later, in C mode, and its use
-   here generates easier-to-read diagnostics when verify (R) fails.
-
-   Define _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT to 1 if static_assert works as per C++11.
-   This will likely be supported by future GCC versions, in C++ mode.
-
-   Use this only with GCC.  If we were willing to slow 'configure'
-   down we could also use it with other compilers, but since this
-   affects only the quality of diagnostics, why bother?  */
-#if (4 < __GNUC__ + (6 <= __GNUC_MINOR__) \
-     && (201112L <= __STDC_VERSION__  || !defined __STRICT_ANSI__) \
-     && !defined __cplusplus)
-# define _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT 1
-#endif
-/* The condition (99 < __GNUC__) is temporary, until we know about the
-   first G++ release that supports static_assert.  */
-#if (99 < __GNUC__) && defined __cplusplus
-# define _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT 1
-#endif
-
-/* FreeBSD 9.1 <sys/cdefs.h>, included by <stddef.h> and lots of other
-   system headers, defines a conflicting _Static_assert that is no
-   better than ours; override it.  */
-#ifndef _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT
-# include <stddef.h>
-# undef _Static_assert
-#endif
-
-/* Each of these macros verifies that its argument R is nonzero.  To
-   be portable, R should be an integer constant expression.  Unlike
-   assert (R), there is no run-time overhead.
-
-   If _Static_assert works, verify (R) uses it directly.  Similarly,
-   _GL_VERIFY_TRUE works by packaging a _Static_assert inside a struct
-   that is an operand of sizeof.
-
-   The code below uses several ideas for C++ compilers, and for C
-   compilers that do not support _Static_assert:
-
-   * The first step is ((R) ? 1 : -1).  Given an expression R, of
-     integral or boolean or floating-point type, this yields an
-     expression of integral type, whose value is later verified to be
-     constant and nonnegative.
-
-   * Next this expression W is wrapped in a type
-     struct _gl_verify_type {
-       unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: W;
-     }.
-     If W is negative, this yields a compile-time error.  No compiler can
-     deal with a bit-field of negative size.
-
-     One might think that an array size check would have the same
-     effect, that is, that the type struct { unsigned int dummy[W]; }
-     would work as well.  However, inside a function, some compilers
-     (such as C++ compilers and GNU C) allow local parameters and
-     variables inside array size expressions.  With these compilers,
-     an array size check would not properly diagnose this misuse of
-     the verify macro:
-
-       void function (int n) { verify (n < 0); }
-
-   * For the verify macro, the struct _gl_verify_type will need to
-     somehow be embedded into a declaration.  To be portable, this
-     declaration must declare an object, a constant, a function, or a
-     typedef name.  If the declared entity uses the type directly,
-     such as in
-
-       struct dummy {...};
-       typedef struct {...} dummy;
-       extern struct {...} *dummy;
-       extern void dummy (struct {...} *);
-       extern struct {...} *dummy (void);
-
-     two uses of the verify macro would yield colliding declarations
-     if the entity names are not disambiguated.  A workaround is to
-     attach the current line number to the entity name:
-
-       #define _GL_CONCAT0(x, y) x##y
-       #define _GL_CONCAT(x, y) _GL_CONCAT0 (x, y)
-       extern struct {...} * _GL_CONCAT (dummy, __LINE__);
-
-     But this has the problem that two invocations of verify from
-     within the same macro would collide, since the __LINE__ value
-     would be the same for both invocations.  (The GCC __COUNTER__
-     macro solves this problem, but is not portable.)
-
-     A solution is to use the sizeof operator.  It yields a number,
-     getting rid of the identity of the type.  Declarations like
-
-       extern int dummy [sizeof (struct {...})];
-       extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct {...})]);
-       extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})];
-
-     can be repeated.
-
-   * Should the implementation use a named struct or an unnamed struct?
-     Which of the following alternatives can be used?
-
-       extern int dummy [sizeof (struct {...})];
-       extern int dummy [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})];
-       extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct {...})]);
-       extern void dummy (int [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})]);
-       extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})];
-       extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct _gl_verify_type {...})];
-
-     In the second and sixth case, the struct type is exported to the
-     outer scope; two such declarations therefore collide.  GCC warns
-     about the first, third, and fourth cases.  So the only remaining
-     possibility is the fifth case:
-
-       extern int (*dummy (void)) [sizeof (struct {...})];
-
-   * GCC warns about duplicate declarations of the dummy function if
-     -Wredundant-decls is used.  GCC 4.3 and later have a builtin
-     __COUNTER__ macro that can let us generate unique identifiers for
-     each dummy function, to suppress this warning.
-
-   * This implementation exploits the fact that older versions of GCC,
-     which do not support _Static_assert, also do not warn about the
-     last declaration mentioned above.
-
-   * GCC warns if -Wnested-externs is enabled and verify() is used
-     within a function body; but inside a function, you can always
-     arrange to use verify_expr() instead.
-
-   * In C++, any struct definition inside sizeof is invalid.
-     Use a template type to work around the problem.  */
-
-/* Concatenate two preprocessor tokens.  */
-#define _GL_CONCAT(x, y) _GL_CONCAT0 (x, y)
-#define _GL_CONCAT0(x, y) x##y
-
-/* _GL_COUNTER is an integer, preferably one that changes each time we
-   use it.  Use __COUNTER__ if it works, falling back on __LINE__
-   otherwise.  __LINE__ isn't perfect, but it's better than a
-   constant.  */
-#if defined __COUNTER__ && __COUNTER__ != __COUNTER__
-# define _GL_COUNTER __COUNTER__
-#else
-# define _GL_COUNTER __LINE__
-#endif
-
-/* Generate a symbol with the given prefix, making it unique if
-   possible.  */
-#define _GL_GENSYM(prefix) _GL_CONCAT (prefix, _GL_COUNTER)
-
-/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as an integer constant expression
-   that returns 1.  If R is false, fail at compile-time, preferably
-   with a diagnostic that includes the string-literal DIAGNOSTIC.  */
-
-#define _GL_VERIFY_TRUE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \
-   (!!sizeof (_GL_VERIFY_TYPE (R, DIAGNOSTIC)))
-
-#ifdef __cplusplus
-# if !GNULIB_defined_struct__gl_verify_type
-template <int w>
-  struct _gl_verify_type {
-    unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: w;
-  };
-#  define GNULIB_defined_struct__gl_verify_type 1
-# endif
-# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \
-    _gl_verify_type<(R) ? 1 : -1>
-#elif defined _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT
-# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \
-    struct {                                   \
-      _Static_assert (R, DIAGNOSTIC);          \
-      int _gl_dummy;                          \
-    }
-#else
-# define _GL_VERIFY_TYPE(R, DIAGNOSTIC) \
-    struct { unsigned int _gl_verify_error_if_negative: (R) ? 1 : -1; }
-#endif
-
-/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as a declaration without a
-   trailing ';'.  If R is false, fail at compile-time, preferably
-   with a diagnostic that includes the string-literal DIAGNOSTIC.
-
-   Unfortunately, unlike C11, this implementation must appear as an
-   ordinary declaration, and cannot appear inside struct { ... }.  */
-
-#ifdef _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT
-# define _GL_VERIFY _Static_assert
-#else
-# define _GL_VERIFY(R, DIAGNOSTIC)                                    \
-    extern int (*_GL_GENSYM (_gl_verify_function) (void))             \
-      [_GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, DIAGNOSTIC)]
-#endif
-
-/* _GL_STATIC_ASSERT_H is defined if this code is copied into assert.h.  */
-#ifdef _GL_STATIC_ASSERT_H
-# if !defined _GL_HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT && !defined _Static_assert
-#  define _Static_assert(R, DIAGNOSTIC) _GL_VERIFY (R, DIAGNOSTIC)
-# endif
-# if !defined _GL_HAVE_STATIC_ASSERT && !defined static_assert
-#  define static_assert _Static_assert /* C11 requires this #define.  */
-# endif
-#endif
-
-/* @assert.h omit start@  */
-
-/* Each of these macros verifies that its argument R is nonzero.  To
-   be portable, R should be an integer constant expression.  Unlike
-   assert (R), there is no run-time overhead.
-
-   There are two macros, since no single macro can be used in all
-   contexts in C.  verify_true (R) is for scalar contexts, including
-   integer constant expression contexts.  verify (R) is for declaration
-   contexts, e.g., the top level.  */
-
-/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as an integer constant expression.
-   Return 1.  This is equivalent to verify_expr (R, 1).
-
-   verify_true is obsolescent; please use verify_expr instead.  */
-
-#define verify_true(R) _GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, "verify_true (" #R ")")
-
-/* Verify requirement R at compile-time.  Return the value of the
-   expression E.  */
-
-#define verify_expr(R, E) \
-   (_GL_VERIFY_TRUE (R, "verify_expr (" #R ", " #E ")") ? (E) : (E))
-
-/* Verify requirement R at compile-time, as a declaration without a
-   trailing ';'.  */
-
-#ifdef __GNUC__
-# define verify(R) _GL_VERIFY (R, "verify (" #R ")")
-#else
-/* PGI barfs if R is long.  Play it safe.  */
-# define verify(R) _GL_VERIFY (R, "verify (...)")
-#endif
-
-#ifndef __has_builtin
-# define __has_builtin(x) 0
-#endif
-
-/* Assume that R always holds.  This lets the compiler optimize
-   accordingly.  R should not have side-effects; it may or may not be
-   evaluated.  Behavior is undefined if R is false.  */
-
-#if (__has_builtin (__builtin_unreachable) \
-     || 4 < __GNUC__ + (5 <= __GNUC_MINOR__))
-# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : __builtin_unreachable ())
-#elif 1200 <= _MSC_VER
-# define assume(R) __assume (R)
-#elif ((defined GCC_LINT || defined lint) \
-       && (__has_builtin (__builtin_trap) \
-           || 3 < __GNUC__ + (3 < __GNUC_MINOR__ + (4 <= 
__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__))))
-  /* Doing it this way helps various packages when configured with
-     --enable-gcc-warnings, which compiles with -Dlint.  It's nicer
-     when 'assume' silences warnings even with older GCCs.  */
-# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : __builtin_trap ())
-#else
-  /* Some tools grok NOTREACHED, e.g., Oracle Studio 12.6.  */
-# define assume(R) ((R) ? (void) 0 : /*NOTREACHED*/ (void) 0)
-#endif
-
-/* @assert.h omit end@  */
-
-#endif

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 missing_d/ChangeLog  |   5 +
 missing_d/intprops.h | 455 ---------------------------------------------------
 missing_d/verify.h   | 285 --------------------------------
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 740 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 missing_d/intprops.h
 delete mode 100644 missing_d/verify.h


hooks/post-receive
-- 
gawk



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]